She has been used<span> as a symbol for </span>women's<span> rights more than once, including as part of the National </span>American Woman Suffrage<span> Association during the </span>early<span> part of the </span>twentieth century<span>. There have ... It certainly was not the </span>Sacagawea Expedition<span>; she </span>did<span> not guide Captains </span>Lewis<span> and </span>Clark<span> all the way to the Pacific Ocean. Please put me as brainlest if this answer is correct! Thank you!</span>
Chronological thinking<span> is at the heart of historical reasoning. Without a strong sense of </span>chronology<span>--of when events occurred and in what temporal order--it is impossible for students to examine relationships among those events or to explain historical causality.
My position on the draft is in favor, because I support the idea that military service should be voluntary.
Military service should be voluntary because when it becomes a draft, it ends up violating basic civil rights. For example, some people are radical pacifists, and their pacifism is an intimate part of who they are. If these people were drafted, their right to believe in something would be violated.
Voluntary service is without a doubt more just than required military service. Voluntary service does not violate any civil rights, and it may even result in a better military because only those who want to be part of the armed forces end up being recruited.
