Answer:
If this had not been done, we would not have the government that we do. In fact, the Articles of Confederation described a different government in an equal level of detail, and those articles had also been ratified by the people. If the Articles had not been ratified, that government would not have existed. We wrote, and ratified the Constitution because we tried the Articles of Confederation and found that they did not work.
Without the constitution, we have nothing.
Without a Constitution of some kind you either have no government, or a crazy autocratic one.
Roman authorities treated conquered people in a very just way. Once the conquered decided to accept their conquerors and started paying taxes and supplying soldiers, the Romans allowed them to maintain their beliefs, their local governments and their customs, giving them partial citenzenship and thus making them able to marry Romans and carry trade.
I believe the answer is: <span>Compared to the British colonists, the French population was relatively low.
Due to amount of soldiers available at their command, the british colonists can afford to went into confrontation with the natives without compromising their national defense. The french did not possess the same luxury as the british empire had, which force them to choose non-confrontational approach.</span>
Answer:
JFK was a strong leader even though he was always sick, he stood strong through his sickness and throughout his presidency.
Explanation:
So an important lesson the current president can learn from is that, He needs to stand strong even through his weaknesses and be the best president he can be.
<span> Center of learning and trade</span>
