Answer:
The volume of the cone is 100.48 units³ approximately
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the volume of a cone with a diameter of 8 unit and height of 6 units, we will follow the steps below;
first, write down the formula for calculating the volume of a cone
v= πr²data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc249/bc2497c665e53d0456f428ba6541e655189dd342" alt="\frac{h}{3}"
where v is the volume of the cone
r is the radius and h is the height of the cone
from the question given, diameter d = 8 units but d=2r which implies r=d/2
r=8/2 = 4 units
Hence r= 4 units
height = 6 units
π is a constant and is ≈ 3.14
we can now proceed to insert the values into the formula
v= πr²data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc249/bc2497c665e53d0456f428ba6541e655189dd342" alt="\frac{h}{3}"
v ≈ 3.14 × 4² × 6/3
v ≈ 3.14 × 16 × 2
v ≈ 100 .48 units³
Therefore the volume of the cone is 100 .48 units³ approximately
Answer:
x=6
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide both sides by 3
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
What is unmeasured cofounding?
- By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
- The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.
Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:
brainly.com/question/10863424
#SPJ4
The slope of the given line is the coefficient of x, 3/5. The slope of the perpendicular line will be the negative reciprocal of that: -1/(3/5) = -5/3.
The point-slope form of the equation for a line of slope m through point (h, k) can be written ...
... y = m(x -h) +k
For your point and the slope found above, this becomes
... y = (-5/3)(x -15) -5
When x=0, this is
... y = (-5/3)(-15) -5 = 20
The y-intercept is 20.
Answer:
N=9/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Question: <u>10=2N+1</u>
1) Subtract 1 from both sides:
9=2N
2) Divide both sides of the equation by 2:
N=9/2