A preferred boom in wages will end result basically within the short-run aggregate supply curve shifting to the left.
Definition. short-run aggregate supply (SRAS) is a graphical model that suggests the tremendous relationship between the mixture fee level and the quantity of aggregate output furnished in a financial system.
Within the quick run, mixture supply responds to better demand (and charges) by growing the use of present-day inputs within the production method. In the short run, the level of capital is fixed, and a employer can't, for instance, erect a new factory or introduce a brand new generation to increase manufacturing performance.
The intersection of the financial system's combination call for and short-run aggregate supply curves determines its equilibrium actual GDP and price level in the end. the short-run mixture delivers curve is an upward-sloping curve that indicates the quantity of general output with a view to being produced at every charge level inside the quick run.
Learn more about aggregate supply here: brainly.com/question/24457739
#SPJ4
I would say that this was a combination of two features: the fact that Greece is mountainous ( I think this is the major reason) so the cities were located in valleys that were not easily accessible from other valleys, and that there were many islands
These both features made communication more difficult and defense easier.
Answer:
ADD MORE CONTEXTTTT, we dont know what this applies to
Explanation:
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
Answer:
it led to the creation of unified monarchy
Explanation:
