All categories

3 years ago

Explain how can you avoid conflict by adjusting your own behavior?

Business

2 answers:

Alenkasestr [34]3 years ago

5 0

You can avoid it by being good and helping you can also not say bad stuff a bout people

hoa [83]3 years ago

3 0

You can avoid conflict by adjusting your own behavior because if you are calm and don't get irritated with someone it implies that you are not trying to argue or cause a fight.

Other answers:

Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.

Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.

I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.

Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.

Learn more about equilibrium from

brainly.com/question/517289

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

"Americans in this decade are less likely than in the prior decade to say they want to lose weight, with the average dropping fr

Scilla [17]

Answer a. Estimate a population proportion.

Explanation:

A population proportion denotes a specific attribute of a population measured in percentage, the above analysis is on losing weight by the populace.

A mean only refers to the average of the population without reference to a particular quality.

The analysis is not testing a claim but it's only making reference to earlier findings on the population. A claim would have given us a specific quality which the population has been predicted or established to adhere to.

4 0

3 years ago

A small market orders copies of a certain magazine for its magazine rack each week. Let X 5 demand for the magazine, with pmf Su

Oksanka [162]

Answer:

See explanation below.

Explanation:

Let X the random variable that represent the demand for the magazine, the pmf for X is given by:

X 1 2 3 4 5 6

P(X) 1/15 2/15 3/15 4/15 3/15 2/15

3 magazines

For this case the total spent is 2*3 = $ 6

And the net revenue for this case would be:

$4-$6 = -$2 , X=1 (demand 1)

$4*2-$6 = $2 , X=2 (demand 2)

$4*3-$6 = $6 , X=3 (demand 3)

For the values of X=4,5,6 the net revenue will be $6 since the number of magazines is 3

And the expected value for the net revenue would be:

$E(R) = \frac{1}{15} *(-2) +\frac{2}{15} *(2) +\frac{3}{15}*(6) + \frac{4}{15}*(6) +\frac{3}{15}*(6) +\frac{2}{15}*(6) = \frac{74}{15}=4.93$

4 magazines

For this case the total spent is 2*4 = $ 8

And the net revenue for this case would be:

$4-$8 = -$4 , X=1 (demand 1)

$4*2-$8 = $0 , X=2 (demand 2)

$4*3-$8 = $4 , X=3 (demand 3)

$4*4-$8 = $8 , X=4 (demand 4)

For the values of X=5,6 the net revenue will be $8 since the number of magazines is 4

And the expected value for the net revenue would be:

$E(R) = \frac{1}{15} *(-4) +\frac{2}{15} *(0) +\frac{3}{15}*(4) + \frac{4}{15}*(8) +\frac{3}{15}*(8) +\frac{2}{15}*(8) = \frac{80}{15}=5.33$

As as we can see we have a higher expected value for the case with 4 magazines.

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose there are 100 million in the labor force, and 6 million unemployed people. During the next month, 200,000 people lose th

laiz [17]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

First, we need to calculate the currently employed people and the unemployment rate:

Employed people= 100,000,000 - 6,000,000= 94,000,000

Unemployment rate= unemployed people / labor force

Unemployment rate= 6,000,000 / 100,000,000

Unemployment rate= 0.06= 6%

Now, the newly employed people and the unemployment rate:

Employed people= 94,000,000 + 300,000 - 200,000

Employed people= 94,100,000

Unemployment rate= 5,900,000 / 100,000,000

Unemployment rate= 0.059 = 5.9%

6 0

3 years ago