Answer:
Jing-mei discovered that she and her mother are so different and that she will not let her mother's expectations be what she becomes. Rather, she will be her own self and do the things she wanted to do.
This scene helped develop the theme of discovering and accepting one's true identity and accepting things even though they may not be what others expect and want to see.
Explanation:
Amy Tan's short story "Two Kinds," tells the story of Jing-mei and her mothers’ high hopes for her. But despite all the expectations, Jing-mei also struggled with accepting her own identity as a Chinese girl living in America.
Paragraph 15 of the story reveals the scene where Jing-mei 'discovered' her true self, looking in the mirror. She declares<em> "I had new thoughts, willful thoughts - or rather, thoughts filled with lots of won'ts. I won't let her change me, I promised myself. I won't be what I'm not." </em>This scene is the transition from her rejecting her mother's expectations of her and her decision to be true to herself and do what she wants. She also discovered that she truly hated what her mother wants for her and that they are two poles apart.
This scene helped develop the theme of discovering one's identity amidst what her family expects from her and the need to 'adhere' to certain expected rules.
What sets off appositives in the sentence is the use of the quotation mark, comma (,). This indicates that the phrase is just an added information in the sentence, and if omitted will never change the whole thought or idea of the sentence. Aside from commas, parentheses or dashes can be used as well.
After a thorough research, there exists the same question that has the full passage.
<span>One might think that proud English writers would welcome a broader readership. However, quite the opposite happened. Though scholars agreed that English was a great language, many felt that it was in danger. According to some scholars, when poorly educated people read, wrote, and spoke, they corrupted the English language.
Today, if you do not know how to spell a word, you look it up in the dictionary. During the early eighteenth century, there were few dictionaries. Those that did exist were mainly collections of difficult words or translation dictionaries (Latin to English, for example). There was no authority on the"correct" way to use or spell words.
</span>
The line in the passage that explains why English scholars felt a dire need to set standards for the English language is this one "<span>According to some scholars, when poorly educated people read, wrote, and spoke, they corrupted the English language."</span>
Answer:
More info needed
Explanation:
I don't know any of the characters eo this can't be answered
Here is a suggestion for you:
When looking deeply into the characteristics of the
character Winston Smith within the novel _1984_ by George Orwell, we can see
that he has plain, ordinary, and everyday qualities that make this character
quite believable in terms of “this could be a real person.” As such, it is possible for anyone to see
himself or herself as Winston Smith, which makes the novel all the more
believable. One thing you could do
(because the directions you provided do not state the modern day equivalent
needs to be famous; however, it is always best to ask your teacher if this
would be okay) is draw correlations between yourself and Winston Smith. Again, the characteristics of Winston are
such that it is possible for most readers to see elements of themselves within
the character of Winston. As such, you could
be quite possible for you to present arguments for you seeing yourself as a
modern day equivalent, and you would obviously know yourself better than anyone
in existence (or fictional) so much so that the arguments for this equivalence
could be quite strong.
