1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
3 years ago
9

Question 4 of 10

History
2 answers:
hodyreva [135]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is B) the force that keeps people connected.

The title of the story, "Gravity," most likely represents the force that keeps people connected.

That is what the story really represents and what the title of the story projects. Although gravity is the force of nature that allows existence on planet Earth, in the story it can be understood as the force that joins people in difficult times and gives sense to many moments in people's lives; what keeps humans connected and show endurance.

torisob [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

maybe c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Could the revolutionary war have occurred without the landmark documents
dimaraw [331]
NO. because that was what the whole entire war was ABOUT..
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
first proposed by the National Organization for Women (NOW) in 1970. passed by Congress in 1972 and ratified by 34 states by the
umka2103 [35]

Equal Rights amendment, this amendment was proposed by National Organization for Women which aimed at bringing the following amendments as,

  • "<em>Equality of Rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United states or any state on account of sex</em>."
  • "<em>The congress shall have the power to enforce,  the provisions of this article through appropriate legislation.</em>"
  • "<em>This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification</em>."

National Organization for Women was succeeded in passing it in the Congress in 1972, even this bill was also ratified by,

the then President Richard Nixon, but they were not so successful in passing it from the 38 states out of Fifty states of United States of America.

To know more about, women rights in U.S.A, <em>click here-</em>

brainly.com/question/8860769

<em> </em>

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
What is the reason that countries might engage in a cold war?
yaroslaw [1]

Answer: C

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
The Preamble of the United States is one of the most important introductions ever written in United States history, however, it
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

you need to break all of this down

Explanation:

its to many questions in one post

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did arkansas southern democrats believe the main role was?
    5·1 answer
  • What effects did technology have on the agricultural sector in the postwar years?​
    13·1 answer
  • Compare Nat Turner and Fredrick Douglass
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following documents was important to convincing the American Colonists to break away from Britain?
    5·2 answers
  • To date, Uranus is known to have 13 rings made from which of the following?
    13·2 answers
  • How did other European nations react to the french revolution? Countries began to seek _______ from _________.
    15·1 answer
  • Whos the impostor red or blue​
    6·1 answer
  • A system of checks and balances was included in the United States Constitution because the authors were concerned
    11·1 answer
  • How does the north generally feel the topic of slavery?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the wave of immigration to the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s affect the country's population distribut
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!