1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
12

During the debate over California statehood which political figure refused to compromise regarding the expansion of slavery

History
1 answer:
Naddika [18.5K]3 years ago
6 0

During the debate over California statehood, the vice president of the United States, John Calhoun, refused to compromise regarding the expansion of slavery.

It happened due to the fact that he considered slavery a "positive good" (using his words). His position had the support of a segment of society and had consequences that even influenced the civil war, later to come.

You might be interested in
Which factor contributed most to the untied states’ shift in foreign policy toward détente during Richard Nixon’s presidency?
inysia [295]

Answer:

its A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Can some one help me please
valina [46]
It relied on a system of slave labor.
7 0
3 years ago
What are the three sections of the Great Plains region of Texas? (OC1)<br><br><br> .
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

The Great Plains region of Texas is part of the larger Great Plains of North America.  The 3 separate areas in this region include the High Plains, the Edward Plateau, and the Llano Basin.  The landforms in these areas include plains, plateaus , canyons , escarpments , and basins .

Explanation:

I believe this is the answer that you are looking for....

4 0
3 years ago
Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which cultural, political, military, or economic changes resulting from the Col
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

East Asia:

The end of World War 2 resulted in the utter collapse of the Axis powers, namely Germany, Italy, and Japan, and pulled the United States out of isolationism, which resulted in the emergence of two global superpowers: The United States and the Soviet Union. However, after the Yalta Conference, it quickly became clear that Stalin wished to dominate Eastern Europe and develop a buffer zone between the remnants of Germany and the USSR in order to 'protect against any possible future German aggression - at least officially. However, it was widely believed that Stalin wished to spread the revolution around the globe. This was despite promises of free elections in occupied territories.

The issue here is that Communism and Capitalism are drastically different and intensely clashing ideologies. One values freedom of market, while the other values state control of the markets. The emergence of nuclear weapons also made the Soviets come to a harsh realization - that the American arsenal was superior to theirs. As such, the Russians began developing nuclear weapons of their own, and they would soon see this success come to fruition. This created massive tensions between Russia and the United States, as the power of nuclear technology had already been displayed in full view on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Third, the American fear of communism and the sometimes excessive witch-hunting lead to extreme mistrust between the two powers. As such, they often supported opposing sides in proxy conflicts.

For this example, I will be using the outbreak of the Vietnam war. When the war began in 1955, America and Russia both began supplying their respective sides -  Russia, the Viet Minh and America the Republican government in Saigon. As the conflict escalated and it became increasingly spotlighted South Vietnam's inefficencies, lack of military competency, and underground pro-communist insurrections, America began deploying soldiers. This began slowly at first and escalated into over 543,000 active troops at its peak.

Despite such a large troop presence, the communist and their insurgent allies were continuing to gain victories. America became desperate to save face and secure some kind of victory, even if it was a strategic one. As such, they began napalming the Vietnamese jungles and bombing Hanoi and other major Northern cities in an attempt to weaken and possibly destroy the Soviet-backed government. As such, it is arguable that the American fervor for victory and triumph over the Communist cause was high enough that they were willing to attempt to destroy an entire nation. The damages done by the American military were massive, and the civilian casualties extreme. Because of this, we can say that this region of East Asia was riddled with conflict and devastation because of America and the Soviet Union's ideological rivalry.

7 0
2 years ago
In document A, what view does Andrew Carnegie take toward organized labor?
Leya [2.2K]
I need to see document A
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How do gorls run the world?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes how an Arizona citizen could influence local political decisions?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the majority party’s power when it comes to senate committees
    11·2 answers
  • Who might have been a concern for America did not support the new Latin American nations
    5·1 answer
  • Describe when Columbus and his sailors first discovered new land
    6·1 answer
  • Why were Latin American nations hit especially hard during the Great Depression?
    5·2 answers
  • Abolitionists fought to:end slavery,get women the right to vote, stop the industrial revolution,end immigration to the U.S
    6·1 answer
  • A. Why did former Confederates approve of Presidential Reconstruction and disapprove of Radical
    11·2 answers
  • Answer Fast!!<br> Why did the United states arm the mujaheddin rebels in Afghanistan?
    12·1 answer
  • The doctrine of nullification outlined by john c. Calhoun in response to the tariff of abominations argued that.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!