Governments typically had been either unitary or confederated. Or another way to say that is that they either focused on centralized power (in someone like a king) or particularized power -- the power in the parts of a kingdom rather than at the center.
So, for instance, in France (prior to its Revolution), all the power in the kingdom centered in the hands of the king. For 175 years, they didn't even have a meeting of the Estates General which was their version of a representative body. And the power of nobles on their lands was reduced while the king's power grew.
Meanwhile, in the German territories, there was a loose confederation called the Holy Roman Empire. One of the kings or princes held the title of "emperor," but he really had no imperial power. The confederated German states retained control over their own kingdoms or territories.
The American experiment mixed something of the best of both approaches. There would be strong central power in the federal government, but putting checks and balances on that power by retaining certain aspects of control in the hands of the states within the union.
I believe it's camelot. Sorry if I'm wrong.
"b. Women search for plant foods while men herd their domesticated animals" and "<span>c. They meet all of their food needs by killing animals" are not correct, since the fact that they have to hunt means they don't have any domesticated animals, and they could also get food from plants. </span>
The answer that best describes how African Americans participated in the war effort during World War II is letter B. They were fully integrated into the armed forces and fought alongside whites. They actually volunteered to join
I looked it up and it says it is ‘a capita yearly tax historically levied on non-Muslim subjects, called the dhimma, permanently residing in Muslim lands governed by Islamic law’
So the answer is C
