The correct answer is letter D. self-interest/competition. Economists Adam Smith and Thomas Malthus wrote that all players in the market are motivated by self-interest, yet regulated by competition.
Here are the choices.
<span> A. need/want
B. income/jobs
C. supply/demand
D. self-interest/competition</span>
The chief Information officer is the representative for is and it issues within the executive staff who provides the is perspective during discussions of problem solutions, proposals, and new initiatives.
Analytic type of intelligence is usually most valued during high school and college.
<h3>What kind of intelligence is typically valued the most?</h3>
It is predicted that musical, bodily-kinesthetic, and naturalist intelligence will be seen as the three traits that society values the least, with logical/mathematical skills being most usually seen as the highest.
<h3>Which is the best example of a task that requires high fluid intelligence?</h3>
The capacity for abstract thought, reasoning, and problem-solving is a component of fluid intelligence. This aptitude is seen as unrelated to learning, experience, or education. Puzzle-solving and developing solutions to problems are two instances of using fluid intelligence.
To learn more about intelligence visit:
brainly.com/question/9944825
#SPJ4
Answer:
Both nepal and swizerland are mountainous and landlocked countries. Swizerland is highly developed and rich, but Nepal is not so developed because people are more educated in Swizerland then of Nepal. In Nepal, many people works after passing school but in Swizerland you must have to learn 12 years in universities to get a job. In Swizerland there is a provision of less import and more export but in Nepal more goods are import from other countries. Transportation facility is good in Swizerland then of Nepal. Swizerland is utilizing natural resources available but Nepal is not utilizing national resources available. Political stabilty can be seen in swizerland but in nepal polical instability can be seen.
Answer:
"In international environmental agreements, the idea that scientific uncertainty should not be used as an excuse for inaction is known as:" <u>The precautionary approach.</u>
Explanation:
The precautionary approach is ability to asserts that the burden of proof for potentially harmful actions by industry or government rests on the assurance of safety. And that, when there are threats of serious damages, scientific uncertainty must be resolved in favor of prevention.
