1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
7

The management of dominican sugar company is considering whether to process further raw sugar into refined sugar. refined sugar

can be sold for $2.23 per pound, and raw sugar can be sold without further processing for $1.43 per pound. raw sugar is produced in batches of 42,500 pounds by processing 100,000 pounds of sugar cane, which costs $0.36 per pound of cane. refined sugar will require additional processing costs of $0.49 per pound of raw sugar, and 1.25 pounds of raw sugar will produce 1 pound of refined sugar.
Business
1 answer:
horsena [70]3 years ago
5 0

We shall Ignore cost of sugar cane at $0.36 per pound, as its going to be incurred for both processes.

Lets find the cash flow from not processing further:

42500 pounds Sugar @ $1.43 per Pound $60,775

Lets find the cash flow from Processing Further:

If 42500 pounds of raw sugar are processed further, we get 34000 pounds of refined sugar(42500/1.25)

34000 pounds of refined [email protected] $2.23 per pound $75280

Additional Processing charges for 42500 [email protected]$0.49 ($20825)

Total Cash Flow $54995

As can be observed, the organisation earns more when they sell raw sugar, Thus sugar should not be processed further.

You might be interested in
The decision making process is best when?
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

when u have 2 decide between 1 and another or when u r taking a test then u have make a decision

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Big AD and AS general equilibrium system (2 points): Assume that the short-run equilibrium output and price combination Yeq,Peq
Andru [333]

Answer:

6hdhksbdjxiiiijjjdh77

3 0
3 years ago
Jurisdiction E spends approximately $7 million each winter on snow removal. The jurisdiction is considering adding a new income
frez [133]

Answer:

'Taxes' can be defined as a compulsory contribution to the state's or country's revenues, which are levied by the governments on personal incomes of individuals or profits of the corporate, or on some transactions.

Taxes are the main source of revenues for any government, through which it receives the necessary funds to spend on various activities it undertakes for public welfare and maintaining the law and order and security of the nation.

Many theorists believe that every tax should be evaluated on certain standards and the following four standards have been mentioned for evaluating whether taxes are good or not:

  1. Taxes should be sufficient to fulfill the government's requirements
  2. Taxes should be convenient for the government to implement and for the citizens to pay
  3. Taxes should be efficient economically
  4. Taxes should be fair

There may be certain provisions introduced in the federal tax system, which are targeted to induce certain behaviors or shift people's attention towards certain activities. These provisions are called tax preferences

Does this proposed change in Jurisdiction E's tax law meet the definition of a tax preference? Explain briefly.

In the given question, the decision of the jurisdiction to give deduction to the people for the snow removal equipment they purchase, is definitely a tax preference as it induces people to invest in snow removing machines, as they are getting full deduction of such expense in income taxes.

By having this provision, the government is motivating people to invest in these machines, and people also have the benefit of having such machine with them, and also getting tax deduction for such expense, so getting such machine almost free (this applies to people who have incomes in such tax bracket only). Thus it is the way of government in encouraging people to buy snow removing machines and reduce the burden on the government. Thus it is clearly a tax preference.

Jurisdiction E forecasts that the proposed change will decrease its annual tax revenues by $250,000 but will improve the jurisdiction's financial condition by $300,000. On what assumptions is this forecast based?

The forecast regarding decrease in annual tax and improvement in financial condition is based on the assumptions of people taking benefit of such a provision, and actually investing in snow removing machines.

The jurisdiction believes that people will purchase the machines and make claims for deductions, effecting the tax revenue by $250,000. But at the same time, as many people will themselves remove the snow, the government doesn't have to spend so much on snow removal and thus make the savings of $300,000

6 0
3 years ago
Shay is preparing to go into her meeting with her supervisor, Jill, to discuss her annual evaluation. She knows that there have
ehidna [41]

Shay was trying to: resist being defensive.

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

The term resist refers to the act of withstanding. It is an act through which a person fights firmly and strongly. The act through which an individual induces threats through the behaviour refers to be defensive. It makes them to be unique in the task they do. A person will be resist and defensive when he or she knows that their work is good enough and there will be no pint to prove them wrong or blamed.

In the given scenario, Shay knows that she performed better and he prepares herself not to be angry in the meeting held by her supervisor. She prepares herself with the entire question that will be asked her by the supervisor and how she must react to those questions. Thus, Shay was trying to: resist being defensive.

5 0
3 years ago
Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that hi
tangare [24]

Answer:

The correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete because some important figures and points are missing in it. These figures and points are therefore provided to complete the question before answering it as follows:

Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that his marginal benefit from an additional soft drink is $100 and his marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza is $110. If the price of a soft drink is $2 and the price of a slice of pizza is $3, is Charley maximizing his total benefits?

A. No, he should increase his consumption of both goods.

B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

C. Yes, there is no other consumption choice that will make his total benefits greater.

D. No, he should shift consumption toward pizza and away from soft drinks to maximize total benefits.'

The explanation of the answer is now provided as follows:

Under utility maximization theory, the condition for the utility or benefit maximization for two goods is as follows:

MBs / Ps = MBp / Pp ……………………………. (1)

Where:

MBs = Marginal benefit from an additional soft drink = $100

MBp = Marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza =$110

Ps = Price of a soft drink = $2

Pp = Price of a slice of pizza = $3

Subtitling the relevant values, we have:

MBs / Ps = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft drinks = $100 / $2 = 50

MBp / Pp = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft pizza = $110 / $3 = 36.67

This implies that 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67

The decision rule is that the limited money income should be spent by a consumer on the good which gives the higher marginal utility per dollar in order to maximize marginal benefit.

Since 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67 above, this implies that Charley is NOT maximizing his total benefits. To maximize his total benefits, Charley should consume more of soft drinks and less of pizza until the condition is consistent with equation (1).

Therefore, the correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose a city block was going to be used for a parking lot in both new york city and a small town. the opportunity cost would b
    15·1 answer
  • Assessment
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the consideration set is false? Group of answer choices
    6·1 answer
  • Abey​ Kuruvilla, of Parkside​ Plumbing, uses 1,220 of a certain spare part that costs ​$26 for each​ order, with an annual holdi
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements describes GAAP?
    5·2 answers
  • The accounting rate of return is computed as: a. Average annual income from the project divided by average annual investment. b.
    9·1 answer
  • A company received a bill for newspaper advertising services received, $400. The bill will be paid in 10 days. How would the tra
    8·1 answer
  • In regards to credit, what does capacity mean?
    14·1 answer
  • INTERVIEW a business owner on the crisis experienced in the workplace attach an interview schedule as part of your oral presenta
    6·1 answer
  • Using the same scenario as in number 2, your interviewer tells you that the game costs $1 to play and it has an expected value o
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!