Answer:
equitable relief
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
A lawyer refers to an individual who has obtained a law degree and is saddled with the responsibility of giving legal advice, initiate and execute lawsuits for his or her clients. These legal practitioners are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidence and give a verdict about legal cases.
An equitable relief also referred to as equitable remedy can be defined as judicial remedies granted to an aggrieved person by a court of equity, requiring that the other party act or refrain from indulging in a specific act because ordinary legal remedies couldn't provide the aggrieved party sufficient (adequate) restitution for an offense commited against him or her. Thus, an equitable relief (remedy) is an injunction granted by a court of equity requiring a party to a contract to either act (mandamus or specific performance) or refrain from indulging in a particular act.
In this context, when a court of competent jurisdiction awards or grants custody of a child to one parent rather than awarding it to the other, this is an example of equitable relief.
In conclusion, an equitable relief or remedy is typically a nonmonetary judgement granted by a court of equity when ordinary legal remedies fail to provide sufficient (adequate) restitution to an aggrieved party.
Answer:
Intrinsic value: $ 45.19290274
The stock is undervalued as is selling for less.
Explanation:
We use the gordon model to solve for the intrinsic value of the share.

we must solve for the grow rate like it was an interest rate:
<u>grow rate: </u>
![2.00 \times (1+g)^{10} = 3.16\\\sqrt[10]{\frac{3.16}{2.00}} -1 = g](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2.00%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2Bg%29%5E%7B10%7D%20%3D%203.16%5C%5C%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B3.16%7D%7B2.00%7D%7D%20-1%20%3D%20g)
g = 0.046804808
<u>dividends one year from now:</u>
3.16 x (1 + 0.046804808) = 3.307903193
Now we calculate the instrinsic value:

Value: $ 45.19290274
The stock is undervalued as is selling for less.
Answer:
Called the clients and cancelled jobs
Explanation:
If the plaintiff worked for the defendant and left to set up her own cleaning business, then she will most likely be bound by a non-compete clause.
So if she is saying she acted with the value of integrity, then she would called any of the defendant's clients and cancelled jobs in order to respect the non-compete clause.
However after sometime the non-compete clause is no longer binding.
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Given that
Total revenue is $70,000
Total fixed cost is $40,000
And, the total variable cost is $10,000
According to the given situation, the computation of profit is shown below:-
Profit = Total Revenue - Total Fixed cost - Total variable cost
= $70,000 - (10,000 × $4) - 10,000
= $70,000 - 40,000 - 10,000
= $10,000
Therefore for computing the profit we simply applied the above formula.
According to the historical and information record, the <u>Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</u> established a minimum wage and overtime pay for employees working more than 40 hours a week.
<u>Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</u> was made to improve the working conditions of employees and also protect their rights against exploring employers.
The <u>Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</u> established standards on minimum wage, working hours, and oppressive child labor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is the "<u>Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938."</u>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/15966261