1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
10

A coin is biased such that it results in 2 heads out of every 3 coins flips on average

Mathematics
2 answers:
alina1380 [7]3 years ago
6 0

<span>The mathematical theory of probability assumes that we have a well defined repeatable (in principle) experiment, which has as its outcome a set of well defined, mutually exclusive, events.</span>


If we assume that each individual coin is equally likely to come up heads or tails, then each of the above 16 outcomes to 4 flips is equally likely. Each occurs a fraction one out of 16 times, or each has a probability of 1/16.

Alternatively, we could argue that the 1st coin has probability 1/2 to come up heads or tails, the 2nd coin has probability 1/2 to come up heads or tails, and so on for the 3rd and 4th coins, so that the probability for any one particular sequence of heads and tails is just (1/2)x(1/2)x(1/2)x(1/2)=(1/16).

Now lets ask: what is the probability that in 4 flips, one gets N heads, where N=0, 1, 2, 3, or 4. We can get this just by counting the number of outcomes above which have the desired number of heads, and dividing by the total number of possible outcomes, 16. 
  
 

<span>N     # outcomes with N heads     probability to get N heads</span>

0                1                                       1/16 = 0.0625

1                4                                       4/16 = 1/4 = 0.25

2                6                                      6/16 = 3/8 = 0.375

3                4                                      4/16 = 1/4 = 0.25

4                1                                      1/16 = 0.0625

We can plot these results on a graph as shown below.

 
The dashed line is shown just as a guide to the eye. Notice that the curve has a "bell" shape. The most likely outcome is for N=2 heads, where the curve reaches its maximum value. This is just what you would expect: if each coin is equally likely to land heads as tails, in four flips, half should come up heads, that is N = 4x(1/2) = 2 is the most likely outcome. Note however that an occurrence of N = 1 or N = 3 is not so unlikely - they occur 1/4 or 25% of the time. To have an occurrence of only N = 0, or N = 4 (no heads, or all heads) is much less likely - they occur only 1/16 or 6.25% of the time.

The above procedure is in principle the way to solve all problems in probability. Define the experiment, enumerate all possible mutually exclusive outcomes (which are usually assumed to be each equally likely), and then count the number of these outcomes which have the particular property being tested for (here for example, the number of heads). Dividing this number by the total number of possible outcomes then gives the probability of the system to have that particular property.

Often, however, the number of possible outcomes may be so large that an explicit enumeration would become very tedious. In such cases, one can resort to more subtle thinking to arrive at the desired probabilities. For example, we can deduce the probabilities to get N heads in 4 flips as follows:

N=0: There is only one possible outcome that gives 0 heads, namely when each flip results in a tail. The probability is therefore 1/16.

N=4: There is only one possible outcome that gives 4 heads, namely when each flip results in a head. The probability is therefore 1/16.

N=1: There are 4 possible outcomes which will have only one coin heads. It may be that the 1st coin is heads, and all others are tails; or it may be that the 2nd coin is heads, and all others are tails; or it may be that the 3rd (or the 4th) coin is heads, and all others are tails. Since there are 4 possible outcomes with one head only, the probability is 4/16 = 1/4.

N=3: To get 3 heads, means that one gets only one tail. This tail can be either the 1st coin, the 2nd coin, the 3rd, or the 4th coin. Thus there are only 4 outcomes which have three heads. The probability is 4/16 = 1/4.

N=2: To enumerate directly all the possible outcomes which have exactly 2 heads only, is a bit trickier than the other cases. We will come to it shortly. But we can get the desired probability for N=2 the following way: We have already enumerated all possible outcomes with either N = 0, 1, 3, or 4 heads. These account for 1 + 4 + 4 + 1 = 10 possible outcomes. The only outcomes not include in these 10 are those with exactly N=2 heads. Since there are 16 possible outcomes, and 10 do not have N=2 heads, there must therefore be exactly 16 - 10 = 6 outcomes which do have exactly N=2 heads. The probability for N=2 is therefore 6/16 = 3/8.

2) Consider the experiment of rolling 3 dice, each of which has 6 sides.

What is the probability that no two dice land with the same number side up, i.e. each of the three dice rolls a different number?

Since each die has 6 possible outcomes, the number of possible outcomes for the roll of three dice is 6x6x6 = 216. We could enumerate all these 216 possibilities, and then count the number of outcomes in which each die has a different number. This is clearly too tedious! Instead we reason as follows:


Digiron [165]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is

B- HHTTTTHTHTTT

For PLATO

:)

You might be interested in
(a) If G is a finite group of even order, show that there must be an element a = e, such that a−1 = a (b) Give an example to sho
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

See proof below

Step-by-step explanation:

First, notice that if a≠e and a^-1=a, then a²=e (this is an equivalent way of formulating the problem).

a) Since G has even order, |G|=2n for some positive number n. Let e be the identity element of G. Then A=G\{e} is a set with 2n-1 elements.

Now reason inductively with A by "pairing elements with its inverses":

List A as A={a1,a2,a3,...,a_(2n-1)}. If a1²=e, then we have proved the theorem.

If not, then a1^(-1)≠a1, hence a1^(-1)=aj for some j>1 (it is impossible that a^(-1)=e, since e is the only element in G such that e^(-1)=e). Reorder the elements of A in such a way that a2=a^(-1), therefore a2^(-1)=a1.

Now consider the set A\{a1,a2}={a3,a4,...,a_(2n-1)}. If a3²=e, then we have proved the theorem.

If not, then a3^(-1)≠a1, hence we can reorder this set to get a3^(-1)=a4 (it is impossible that a^(-1)∈{e,a1,a2} because inverses are unique and e^(-1)=e, a1^(-1)=a2, a2^(-1)=a1 and a3∉{e,a1,a2}.

Again, consider A\{a1,a2,a3,a4}={a5,a6,...,a_(2n-1)} and repeat this reasoning. In the k-th step, either we proved the theorem, or obtained that a_(2k-1)^(-1)=a_(2k)

After n-1 steps, if the theorem has not been proven, we end up with the set A\{a1,a2,a3,a4,...,a_(2n-3), a_(2n-2)}={a_(2n-1)}. By process of elimination, we must have that a_(2n-1)^(-1)=a_(2n-1), since this last element was not chosen from any of the previous inverses. Additionally, a_(2n1)≠e by construction. Hence, in any case, the statement holds true.

b) Consider the group (Z3,+), the integers modulo 3 with addition modulo 3. (Z3={0,1,2}). Z3 has odd order, namely |Z3|=3.

Here, e=0. Note that 1²=1+1=2≠e, and 2²=2+2=4mod3=1≠e. Therefore the conclusion of part a) does not hold

7 0
3 years ago
2. Javier used a microscope to measure the diameter
Elza [17]

Answer:

7 x 10^-5

Step-by-step explanation:

0.00001 is 1 x 10^-5 so multiply that by 7

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A flood a creek's water level changes by −4 7/10 feet in 2 hours. What is the average change in the creek's water level per hour
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

-2.35

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide -4.7/2 = -2.35

3 0
3 years ago
One-half of one-seventh of T equals one-third of one-fifth of 90. What is the value of T
butalik [34]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the equation. Read it carefully.

1/2 * 1/7 T = 1/3 * 1/5 * 90   Reduce

(1/14) * T = 1/15 * 90

1/15 * 90 = 6

(1/14)*T = 6                          Multiply both sides by 14

T = 14 * 6

T = 84

3 0
2 years ago
Which comparison symbol makes each inequality statement true? Enter &lt; , &gt; , or = to make each statement true. Enter your a
siniylev [52]

Answer:

−3.632 > −3.792

|−3.632| < |−3.792|

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

−3.632 −3.792 |−3.632| |−3.792|

First comparison :

−3.632 −3.792

Using the knowledge of number line :

- 3.792 occurs farther to the left of a number line than - 3.632, and numbers which occurs farther to the left are lesser. Therefore,

−3.632 > −3.792

2.)

|−3.632| |−3.792|

The presence of the absolute value symbol annuls the negative sign in the digit given. Hence, we can view both numbers as being positive values as ; 3.632 3.792

Numbers further to the right of a number line are greater and 3.792 occurs farther to the right than 3.632.

Hence,

|−3.632| < |−3.792|

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In △CDE , CD=14 , DE=9 , and m∠E=71∘ .
    5·2 answers
  • Evaluate the following expression using the values given: Find -3a2 - b3 + 3c2 - 2b3 if a = 2, b = -1, and c = 3. Numerical Answ
    9·2 answers
  • Use the two graphs to help complete the statements below
    11·2 answers
  • Please answer please
    11·1 answer
  • 14. What is the value of the missing angle? (1 point)
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose we want to choose 4 colors, without replacement, from 18 distinct colors.
    6·1 answer
  • Evaluate if m = 16 and p = 2. 1/2m + 3p
    13·1 answer
  • Find the number which when divided by 2/5 will give 30<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>​
    7·2 answers
  • For exercises 1-4. use the drawing and an inch ruler to find the actual length and width of each section of the park. Measure to
    7·1 answer
  • If an emitter current is changed by 4 mA, the collector current changes by 3.5 mA. The value of beta will be :​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!