1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babunello [35]
3 years ago
11

_____________, a militaristic city state, was an oligarchy, while its rival ___________ was known for its democratic institution

s
History
1 answer:
Radda [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Sparta, a militaristic city state, was an oligarchy, while its rival Athens was known for its democratic institutions

Explanation:

Sparta was one of the most famous polis in ancient Greece, and the most powerful in the Peloponnese. Unlike most other polis, Sparta expanded on land, instead of expanding at sea, by establishing subsidiary cities. Sparta was a self-contained urban and military state famous for its harsh and one-sided military education and army. Its business was dominated by agriculture and animal husbandry. Sparta did not trade much, nor did it have a significant craft industry or a significant contribution to the development of Greek cultural life.

Athens, in turn, was an ancient city-state in the province of Attica in Greece. In Ancient Athens, democracy was formed, philosophy and the art of theater received classical forms. The Athenians ruled through their powerful fleet in a large number of Ionian colonies in the Aegean islands and the coasts of Asia Minor. Attica was also the metropolis of most Ionian colonies. The Athenians bordered on the north with the Boeotians and on the west with the Megarians, with whom they were often in conflict. Ancient Athens played a leading role in the Persian wars, led the alliance of Delos, as well as one of the two alliances that clashed during the Peloponnesian War.

You might be interested in
Why did benedict Arnold's name come to mean the same as traitor in the U.S.?
Crank
He planned to turn over West Point to the British
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), what did the United States Supreme Court decide?
almond37 [142]
B. and C those where some reason why segregation was a thing
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation on the grounds of race, religion or national origin was banned at all places of
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion. It generally applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including federal, state and local governments. Title VII also applies to private and public colleges and universities, employment agencies, and labor organizations.

Despite Title VII’s passage more than 50 years ago, discrimination in the workplace remains a serious problem.

What should one do if I believe I have been discriminated against under Title VII? if one feel discriminated against under Title VII, The person have the right to file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency charged with enforcing many anti-discrimination laws.

Title VII forbids employers from retaliating against you for filing a charge of discrimination or speaking out against discrimination in your workplace. It also protects you from retaliation if you choose to participate in an investigation, proceeding or hearing on behalf of a co-worker who you believe has had his or her rights violated under Title VII.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the Treaty of Tordesillas? this is ss
dlinn [17]

Answer:

Policy that agreed by two European countries Spain & Portugal to clear up the confusion on newly claimed land in the new era.

Hope it helps!!

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one way the colonist rebelled against british economic politics
Mademuasel [1]
<span>Many Americans viewed all of this as a blatant abuse of power by the British government. Once again a call went out for a colonial congress to sort out a response. On September 5, 1774 delegates appointed by the colonies met in Philadelphia for the First Continental Congress. Drawing upon the successful manner in which previous acts had been overturned the first thing Congress did was to organize a comprehensive embargo of trade with Britain. It then conveyed to the British government a list of grievances that demanded the repeal of thirteen acts of Parliament. All of the acts listed had been passed after 1763 as the delegates had agreed not to question British policies made prior to the conclusion of the Seven Years War. Despite all the problems it had created, the Tea Act was not on the list. The reason for this was that Congress decided not to protest British regulation of colonial trade under the Navigation Acts. In short, the delegates were saying to Parliament take us back to 1763 and all will be well.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The maurya dynasty lasted for
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following generally does not support the Democratic Party?
    7·1 answer
  • Which immigrant groups came to settle in the American West?
    13·1 answer
  • According to verse 33:35 of the Qur’an, what are the qualities of someone Who is favored by God?
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the mostly conservative supporters of Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam war policies
    15·1 answer
  • How did World War ll change life for many women and African Americans?
    6·1 answer
  • Rogue planets give off light. True or false?
    8·2 answers
  • I need help for #5, I want to make sure I’m correct
    7·1 answer
  • What was the name of the celtic holiday that celebrated their official end of summer on october 31?
    6·1 answer
  • Should minimum wage be at 5 dollars an hour? why or why not? be sure to defend your answer.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!