The two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
<h3>What is first amendment?</h3>
The first amendment was made in the year 1791. It protects a lot of the civil rights which include: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and so on.
Since the first amendment protects the freedom of speech we can conclude by saying that the two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
Read more on first amendments here: brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ1
Answer:
South Africa
Explanation:
Satyagraha stands for holding onto the truth. It was started by Mahatma Gandhi in South Africa.
pleas give me brainliest
No, John Adams was the wealthiest founding fathers.
Answer:
In the Second Party Congress vote, the Bolsheviks won votes on the majority of important issues, hence the name. ... The Bolsheviks, or Reds, came to power in Russia during the October Revolution phase of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and founded the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR).
Explanation:
The playwright who was bold enough to introduce strong female charactersin his plays is Aeschylus and an example of his play is The Women of Aetna. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
