The greatest impetus for Oklahoma statehood<span> began after the Land Run of ... Before the passage of the</span>Oklahoma<span> Enabling Act (1906), </span>four statehood plans<span> evolved. ... </span>Indians<span> in O.T. were held in trust by the federal government for twenty-</span>one<span> ... Indian leaders and whites in Indian Territory (I.T.) </span>favored<span> double</span>statehood.<span>The Territory of </span>Oklahoma<span> was an organized incorporated territory of the United States that ... Until this point, </span>Native Americans<span> had exclusively used the land. ... was </span>one<span> of the main supporters of the opening of </span>Oklahoma<span> to white settlement. .... due to the growing idea of </span>statehood<span>, which had originated in Indian Territory.</span>
Answer:
mercantilism increased the likelihood of conflicts between European powers was that it led to dispute over who could trade where, and disputes over the trade agreements themselves, since every country wanted the "best deal".
I hope this helps
Most people were engaged in agriculture as in the U.S. in 1820. They farmed to feed and clothe themselves; in other words, they engaged in subsistence agriculture. Most people did not own land. The land was owned by a few, such as hacendados or the Roman Catholic Church.
There were export sectors in economies. Exports were of two basic kinds: agricultural and mineral. Argentina and Uruguay exported cattle hides and salted beef. Bolivia exported silver and mercury; Peru: silver and, later, guano; Colombia: precious metals and sugar; Brazil: sugar and, later, coffee; and Mexico: silver, gold, and cotton. Most of these exports went to Europe. Little went to each other. None of it in huge volumes even in Argentina until the late 19th century. The countries lacked capital, communications networks, and technology to develop the export business. Besides, the upper class was able to meet its needs without much economic expansion. Societies were run for the benefit of the upper classes.
Barbarous,destructive,vandal,offensive, and disparaging.
