1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bogdan [553]
3 years ago
13

What is 310.286 rounded to the nearest tenth

Mathematics
2 answers:
wel3 years ago
8 0

310.286 rounded to the nearest tenth

We write the place chart for the given number

Hundred     tens    Ones   point     tenths     hundredths       thousandths

  3                1          0            .             2             8                             6

To round the number to nearest tenths, we look at the number in hundredths place. 8 is greater than 5 so we add 1 with the number in tenths place

Hence , the number 2 in tenths place becomes 3

310.286 rounded to the nearest tenth is 310.3

Pani-rosa [81]3 years ago
6 0
The tenths place is the first number to the right of the decimal. in the number 310.286, the two is in the tenths place. the 7 (in the hundreths place) causes the number to be rounded up to 310.3 when rounded to the tenths
You might be interested in
In circle O, AC and BE are diameters. The measure of arc DC is 50°. What is the measure of EBC? ​
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

The angle measure would be 40°

Step-by-step explanation:

Right angles have a measure of 90. Since DC is 50, 90-50 is 40.

6 0
3 years ago
in a week karry ran 9.3 miles and Tricia ran 4.4 miles. Use mental math to find how much farther Karry ran than Tricia. Explain
Ede4ka [16]

i would just round 9.3 to 9 and 4.4 to 4 so i subtract 9-4 so that equals 5 so about a 5 mile diffrence

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which rational number also belongs to the set of whole numbers?
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Answer: A) 15

A natural number is basically a counting number {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...} so any positive whole number. That is why 15 is the answer. Choices B and D are fractional values, so we can rule them out. We can rule out choice C because this value is negative.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
2(3x – 4)= -2(x - 2
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

2(3x-4)=-2(x-2)

6x-8=-2x+4

6x+2x=4+8

8x=12

x=12/8

x=3/2 or x=1.5

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A local improvement store sells different sized of storage sheds. The most expensive shed has a footprint that is 15 feet wide b
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

Question 1: Are the footprints of the two sheds similar?

  • <u>Yes, the two sheds are similar.</u>

Question 2: Tell whether the footprint of the least expensive shed is an enlargement or a reduction,

  • <u>It is a reduction</u>

Question 3: Find the scale factor from the most expensive shed to the least expensive shed

  • <u>The scale factor is 3/2</u>

Explanation:

Question 1: Are the footprints of the two sheds similar?

The<em> footprints</em> of the two sheds will be <em>similar</em> if their measures are proportional.

The ratio of the measures of the<em> footprint of the most expensive shed</em> is:

  • width/length = 15 feet / 21 feet = 5 / 7

The ratio of the measures of the <em>footprint of the least expensive shed</em> is:

  • width/length = 10 feet / 14 feet = 5 / 7

Since, the two ratios are equal, you conclude that the corresponding dimensions are proportional and the two sheds are similar.

Question 2: Tell whether the footprint of the least expensive shed is an enlargement or a reduction.

A <em>reduction</em> is a similar transformation (the image and the preimage are similar)  that maps the original figure into a smaller one.

Since the dimensions of the foot print of the least expensive shed, 10 feet wide by 14 feet long, are smaller than the dimensions of the most expensive shed, 15 feet wide by 21 feet long the you conclude that the former is a reduction of the latter.

Question 3: Find the scale factor from the most expensive shed to the least expensive shed.

To find the <em>scale factor from the most expensive shed to the least expensive shed</em>, you divide the measures of the corresponding dimensions. You can do it either with the widths or with the lengths.

Using the widths, you get:

  • width of the foot print of the most expensive shed / width of the foot print of the least expensive transformation

  • 15 feet / 10 feet = 3/2.

That means that the scale factor from the most expensive shed to the least expensive shed is 3/2.

Using the lenghts, you should obtain the same scale factor:

  • length of the foot print of the most expensive shed / length of the foot print of the least expensive transformation

  • 21 feet / 14 feet = 3/2. Such as expected.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is the solution
    8·2 answers
  • The diagram below shows y as a functional of x, True or False?<br> A)True<br> B)False
    9·2 answers
  • What is the arithmetic of the following numbers? 4,9,6,3,4,2​
    15·1 answer
  • A website randomly creates an initial password for people when they first sign up for an account. The password consists of five
    6·2 answers
  • Suppose we wish to test the hypotheses: H(o): u=15 H(1): u does not = 15 where we know that σ^2 = 9.0. If the true mean is 20, w
    11·1 answer
  • One large potato feeds 2 people. How many potatoes do you need for 10 people?
    8·2 answers
  • A plane intersects the prism parallel to the base. Which best describes the cross section? (5 points)
    7·1 answer
  • I neeed helpppppppp
    9·1 answer
  • If you are told to calculate simple interest, and you are told to calculate the interest for 6 months, what would you need to do
    10·2 answers
  • Write a function for the line with a slope of 5 that passes through the point (2, 1). Enter the correct equation in the box.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!