An individual who is observing and evaluating one’s goal-oriented performance is demonstration the self-reflection phase of the self-regulation cycle.
The phases of self-regulation are : the forethought/pre-action, performance control and self-reflection. The self-regulation phase involves reflecting of the performance after self-evaluation of the results is done and compared with the goals. It can be attained through self-observation, self-judgment, and self-reaction.
To know more about self-regulation here
brainly.com/question/2413166?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:</u>
The central route to persuasion is to enduring attitude change as the peripheral route to persuasion is to transient change.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- In order to withstand a change in the attitude, it is mandatory to know how significant it is to pursue the determined goal rather than thinking of the changes that are happening during the course of persuasion.
- In the similar way, it can be proposed that the change is temporary in order to help oneself take a peripheral route to persuasion.
Answer: Play it cool
Explanation: Honestly, if I was you I would just kind of let people come to me. If its anything like my school, people will flock to the new kid, and invite him/her to there group. Try to get in with the so called popular kids, being in that group is generally the best time. If people dont end up coming to you, you could try to ask a group you prefer to sit at there lunch table, or eat lunch with them. Might be hard for a introvert, but give it your all, you got this.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.