1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
777dan777 [17]
3 years ago
5

What was a result of division of labor at Henry ford plants?

History
2 answers:
Lynna [10]3 years ago
5 0

I believe the correct answer is: Workers easily learned each stage of production. Hope this helps!

Andrews [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation

D) Workers easily learned each stage of production

You might be interested in
What changes to the definition of homeland security were manifested in the 2010 qhsr?
Vesnalui [34]

Basically, <u>two important changes were introduced to the definition of homeland security in 2010</u>. <u>First one</u> was about <em><u>Nation’s homeland security missions. </u></em>These missions are enterprise-wide, and not limited to the Department of Homeland Security. Federal Government, State, local, tribal, and territorial governments, the private sector, and other non-governmental organizations are responsible for executing these missions. The homeland security professionals must have a clear sense of what it takes to achieve this vision. <u>The second change</u> was about <em><u>three key and essential concepts for a comprehensive approach to homeland security: Security, Resilience and Customs and Exchange</u></em>.

3 0
2 years ago
In Schenck v. United States, what circumstance made this speech case special? It pertained to a foreign citizen. It involved eve
Igoryamba

Answer:

It occured during wartime

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was Mein Kampf important?
Nookie1986 [14]
Mein Kampf is an important work or document in history because it clearly outlines the roots of Adolf Hitler's ideology prior to his rise to power in Germany. Written while he was in prison, Hitler chronicled his life and also his future political plans for Germany which were based on racist, oppressive, and fascist principles. The book shows the roots of Nazism and the ideas of Hitler that later led to the Holocaust and World War II. 
7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast United States society in the 1920s and the 1950s with respect to two of the following:race relation, role o
FinnZ [79.3K]
They are not in the same year and they are the same because they respected
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the world and the journal attract readers?
    14·1 answer
  • Which country hired henry hudson before holland
    14·2 answers
  • What factors led to unrest and revolution in the Middle East?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe Egyptian culture including details on their government, religion, and social structure.
    9·1 answer
  • What is a market demand schedule?
    12·2 answers
  • Which animals did Europeans bring to the Americas?
    13·1 answer
  • Which region has the largest affected by resistance
    13·2 answers
  • Why was Baltimore harbor so important to the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Consider global movements that impacted the human rights of people during the interwar years.
    11·1 answer
  • C
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!