<span>The admission of Alabama as a slave state was the main point of controversy that led to the Missouri Compromise. After Alabama wanted to be part of the Union by being a slave state, the number of free state to slave state became equal to 11. This angered the free states and the members of the Congress that were in favor of slavery free states. The only way to stop the coming civil war was the Missouri Compromise. If Missouri was admitted as the slave state then the balance of equality would tilt towards the slave states and this would result in a big clash. To stop this from happening, the Missouri Compromise was the middle path that was chosen. </span>
I can't really finish the homework for you, but here is a helpful fact: The Paleo-Indians were the ones who crossed the Bering Strait and people living shortly after this. Here is an idea: describe how the elders would tell legends of this crossing, with boats or on foot on the frozen ice, how they were happy to see the new land and how life in the old land was.
Answer:
c Europa clipper
Explanation:
This is an interplanetary mission that is being developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). It is meant to be launched in June 2023. The objective is to study the Galilean moon of name Europa through a series of flybys. All while still in orbit around Jupiter. So, it's a mission inside our solar system.
Answer:
the Roman Empire.
Explanation:
The government of the United States had a similar political branch as the Roman empire. The Roman empire had a lasting legacy in political aspects such as government, law, language, etc. Though the United States political ideas came from the United Kingdom they could be traced directly to the Roman empire.
Just like the Roman Republic, the United States has three branches and named Senate after the name of Senate of Rome.
Therefore, the Roman empire is the correct answer.
Answer:
- We need to study how to recognize a bias in American Government in order to understand that the laws that are passed by government officials might only benefit a certain group of people while hurting the other groups.
(For example, government decision to let nature exploitation might benefit a certain industry while hurting the people who live around them)
- Recognizing this will definitely help us become better-informed citizens. We can recognize the representatives who are openly advocating for laws that benefit the majority of the citizens rather than a select view and make our society progress as a whole.
