I would say prospect of jobs or lands
The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Answer:
Explanation:
No!
2/1 = 2
16/10 = 1.6
Those two amounts are not the same. It is not a proportion.
They were not treated very well.
In most cases all over the world, people who held the majority religion tend to discriminate against the minority religion.
The jews were forced out of several living territories in Muslim Spain, which force them to migrate into a place that hasn't been settled yet.
