Answer:
1st ONE
Explanation:
He was against government regulation of private businesses.
Answer:
One of the greatest achievements of the civil rights movement, the Civil Rights Act led to greater social and economic mobility for African-Americans across the nation and banned racial discrimination, providing greater access to resources for women, religious minorities, African-Americans and low-income families.
Yes, I would definitely support the Compromise of 1850 as it was fundamental to defuse a four-year political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–1848).
All five separate bills were essential, especially when taking into account their influence over the abolitionist movement.
1. It was import to admit California as a free state.
2. Utah and New Mexico territory had to decide on slavery by popular sovereignty.
3. Texas's boundaries were set at their present form, avoiding further conflicts.
4. Slavery trade was abolished in the District of Columbia - which is the first step to abolish slavery itself.
5. The Fugitive Slave Act was strengthened, which furthered the abolitionist cause.
The Appalachian Mountains influence Georgia's development because the area's large amount of coal deposits provided mining opportunities. Thus, option B is correct.
<h3>What are the Appalachian Mountains? </h3>
The Appalachian Mountains are the oldest mountains in America, and they stretch from America to Canada. According to some experts, these mountains are 480 million years old, along with a stretch of 150 miles.
Georgia is a developing country that became independent of the soviet nation. As the Appalachian Mountains cross the city, the mountains have great coal deposits which help them develop, they even used to export it. Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about the Appalachian Mountains, here:
brainly.com/question/14009769
#SPJ1
Answer:
Answer is C. A leader should analyze a situation before deciding what to do.
Explanation:
Reffering to the proponents of the situational approach by a leader. It should be noted that the behaviors of an excellent and effective leader vary from one situation to another. Analysis of a situation must be first done before what to do.