Imagine that you are an elected representative in 1850. Would you support the comprromise of 1850? Why or why not

1 answer:

6 0

Yes, I would definitely support the Compromise of 1850 as it was fundamental to defuse a four-year political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–1848).

All five separate bills were essential, especially when taking into account their influence over the abolitionist movement.

1. It was import to admit California as a free state.

2. Utah and New Mexico territory had to decide on slavery by popular sovereignty.

3. Texas's boundaries were set at their present form, avoiding further conflicts.

4. Slavery trade was abolished in the District of Columbia - which is the first step to abolish slavery itself.

5. The Fugitive Slave Act was strengthened, which furthered the abolitionist cause.

You might be interested in

1) Which aspect of the Constitution of the United States addressed the

andreyandreev [35.5K]

Is A) article 1? None of these rly look correct bc article 13 is what addresses that Ik fairly sure don’t quote me on that tho lol but article 4 is ur best bet

3 0

2 years ago

Which of the following can employers use to prevent an industrial action by a

liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

<h2>C. </h2><h2>Strikebreakers </h2>

I hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

The assumption that differences between monozygotic (or identical) twins are caused entirely by genetic factors is called the __

Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Equal Environment

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question the term being mentioned in this question is called the Equal Environment Assumption. Like mentioned in this question it assumes the differences in twins are genetic factors since their environments and it's effects seem to always be the exact same when the twins are tested. Which is why it is an assumption and not a fact or theory.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

4 0

3 years ago

Wolfgang kohler considered a chimpanzee's sudden solving of a problem evidence of?

Evgen [1.6K]

Wolfgang kohler considered a chimpanzee's sudden solving of a problem evidence of insight learning.

Wolfgang kohler was a German psychologist studying the behavior of the apes. He did a simple experiment to understand the learning pattern in apes.

He understood from the experiment a new way of learning that occurs by personal experience with the environment which he called insight learning. It involves cognition, or thinking in the process of learning.

There are four stages of learning- preparation, incubation, insight and verification.

To learn more about Wolfgang kohler here

brainly.com/question/10422608

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

Describe how checks and balances plays a role in naming federal judges. why do presidents often follow the unwritten rule of sen

loris [4]

1. Senatorial courtesy is a long-standing unwritten, unofficial, and nonbinding political custom (or constitutional convention) in the United States describing the tendency of U.S. senators to support a Senate colleague in opposing the appointment to federal office of a presidential nominee from that Senator's state.

2. Appointment to Judicial Branch. ... The appointment process serves as a check and balance on the judicial branch because the members of the other two branches select the members of the judicial branch. They choose the Supreme Court justicesand all federal court judges.

6 0

3 years ago