It failed because the people who were indentured servants eventually ended their servitude and left to build their own families and farms. They were also more rebellious then the Africans who were imported from Africa. It wasn't worth it to take Europeans when Africans were better workers.
The federalists presented that they want the u.s constitution as it is and wants to divide up power between the branches of government so that we are all equal and nobody has too much power.
the anti-federalists presentes that they want to change the constitution by wanting the legislative branch to haved more power and that the bill of rights to be added to the constitution becasue they feared that too much power would make a king or tyrant.
hope this helps and i did not copy anything :)
Because it offers the historian an objective snapshot of the public sentiment of the time, which the cartoonist (should be) distilling for their readers, according to their feelings, for mass appeal. I say objective as it is usually very easy to decipher their subjective viewpoint according to the publication. The value of this is that it is tapping into how the masses 'feel' rather than how subjective facts can be built to form historical opinion. It becomes especially valuable prior to this century, when public sentiment is harder to garner as we were less technologically advanced.
It's A, it would only be the first one
