Complete Question:
One type of character development occurs when the author of a story makes a character seem more real or more human. What is the other type of character development?
Group of answer choices
A. When characters remember past events
B. When characters change or grow
C. When characters interact to solve a conflict
D. When characters act in surprising ways
Answer:
B. When characters change or grow.
Explanation:
In Literature, character development can be defined as a literary process or technique in which a writer portrays people as being real or believable in a work of fiction by ascribing depth (details) and personality to them.
Basically, various writers or authors use character development to make the audience or readers learn so much more about the characters as they develop in the story.
One type of character development occurs when the author of a story makes a character seem more real or more human. The other type of character development is when characters change or grow. For example, a character such as a little boy in a story may grow up to become a father with children.
This is the disease of sweat and tears,
a road of pain it steers.
In and out like a roaring fire,
can you hear the church choir?
Lives hanging simply by a thread,
lying here, on a death bed.
You can feel yourself burn and ache,
No doctor will admit their mistake.
Loved ones are lost right and left,
Others left shaken by an untimely death.
Their hope was lost,
until a blessing came, frost.
Raging fevers went cool,
robbed the fire of its fuel.
Answer:
Still I Rise” conveys the spectacular weight of the hardships that African Americans have had to overcome. Although the overall theme of the poem is one of determination to prevail, injustice is presented throughout to bring reality and a sense of history.
Explanation:
Answer:
Courts decide what really happened and what should be done about it. ... They also decide whether or not a person committed a crime and what the punishment should be.
Explanation:
Ad hominem is an attack against the arguer instead of the argument itself in order to cast doubts about arguer's argument.