I'm not positive of this answer but, I'm pretty sure it's 85,688 using common sense. The population would definitely be greater before the epidemic hit because, and infectious disease or anything like that would obviously cause the population to decrease. Therefore, B) is the most reasonable answer.
Answer:
Im sorry i do not seem to be able to see the image
Step-by-step explanation:
51,400 because 60 rounds up and the 3 turns to a 4 bc its the next nearest 100
Step-by-step explanation:
(1 + 3.75%)^2.5 = 1.0964
FV = 1580 (1.0964)
= 1732.31