<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
The answer should be "Dissatisfaction with Athens's growing empire"
Hope this helped
Answer:
i took this quiz
Explanation:
finding a direct trade route to asia/china/india
Answer: Establish rights that belong to the people & Protect the people from the government
Explanation: The Bill of Rights was made a compromise to the signing of the constitution. Originally the constitution gives the government too much power, so several states argued against it. This was compromised by the creation of the Bill of Rights, a list of rights given to the people that the government cant work around. These rights protected the people from their government while also giving them written rights that couldn't be twisted.
