<h2>Joshua would lose and Sue would benefit from unanticipated inflation.</h2>
Explanation:
- Both Joshua and Sue are associated with fixed pension and fixed interest respectively.
- Now the value of money goes down due to inflation
- So to live as usual, Joshua need to spend some extra money. But considering the fixed income, it's a lose to Joshua
- Whereas Sue is associated with fixed interest of mortgage. She is benefited because, though the inflation has changed the value of all other products, but the fixed interest rate does not change.
- "Fixed-rate mortgage holders are inflation winners", says "Thoma, professor of economics at the University of Oregon"
As Marshall observed, "Statistics are the straw out of which I, like every other economist, have to create bricks," this statement does definitely illustrate the significance and relevance of statistics in economics.
The economy is one of the most important aspects of our lives. Professionals in the financial sector frequently use it. However, economics without statistics is useless. We will offer statistics on economics with you in this blog. In economics, various statistics in economics are employed. You can reveal those economic information with the aid of this blog. But first, let's look at what statistics mean in the context of economics.
The quantification of data is handled by statistics. The qualitative data that is used in the data collection was represented using a variety of figures. The methodology used to deal with data collection, tabulation, classification, and presentation is known as statistics in economics.
Learn more about statistics in economics here
brainly.com/question/23822576
#SPJ9
In order to properly tackle this problem, we must understand the relationship between the nominal annual rate and real (effective) annual rate.
To do this:
-First you take the nominal rate, divide by the number of times it's compounded (converted) per year.
-Then, add one to that number, and raise that number to the power of how many times you compound per year.
Here is the method in practice:
First 3 Years:
Nominal rate= 2% ÷ 12 times/yr = 0.001667
Effective rate = 1.001667 ^12 = 1.020184
Next 2 Years (Discounting)
3% ÷ 2/yr = .015
1.015 ^ 2 = 1.061364
Next 4 years (Interest)
.042 ÷ .5 (once every 2 years) = .084
1.084 ^ (1/2) = 1.041153
The last 3 years are already expressed as an effective rate, so we don't need to convert them. The annual rate is:
1.058
I kept the 1 in the numbers (1.058 instead of 5.8% for example) so that it's easier to find the final number
Take every relevant number and raise it to the power of the number of years it's compounded for. For discounting, raise it to a negative power.
First 3 years: 1.020184 ^ 3 = 1.061784
Next 2 years: 1.030225 ^ -2 = .942184
Next 4 years: 1.041163 ^ 4 = 1.175056
Last 3 years: 1.058 ^ -3 = .84439
Multiply these numbers (include all decimals when you do this calculation)
1.062 * .942 * 1.175 * .844 = .992598
This is our final multiplier to find the effect on our principal:
.992598 * 2,480 = 2461.64
Answer is 2461.64
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
Unfavorable weather in the orange groves of California will adversely affect the production of oranges. This will cause a reduction in the supply of oranges. As a result, the price of oranges will decline.
Now, these oranges are used as input in making orange juice. The increase in input price will lead to an increase in the cost of production. This will further lead to a decrease in the supply of orange juice. Consequently, the equilibrium price of orange juice will increase.
Answer:
Mexico's speciality is the manufacture of high-end vehicles and it exports those. They then import low-end vehicles that are usually manufactured at a low cost in other places.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage refers to the ability of an economy to create products and services at a reduced cost than that of the business partners.
