1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saw5 [17]
3 years ago
12

Why did Buddhism become popular in India? Will mark brainliest and keep it simple.

Social Studies
2 answers:
Mama L [17]3 years ago
8 0
Following the death of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, who was born in Nepal near the northern border of India, his followers began to share his teachings by traveling first to India and later along the Silk Road from China to the Mediterranean. An Indian emperor named Ashoka was among the most passionate Buddhists to spread the religion
maw [93]3 years ago
6 0
Buddhism<span> also became </span>popular in India<span> as it meshed with the existing religious traditions known as Jainism, and forms of Hinduism. ... However, </span>Buddhism<span> also modified other aspects of ancient religious traditions, such as the more rigidly ascetic practices of Jainism</span>
You might be interested in
The passage above from Article 1, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution reflects the principle of
faust18 [17]
It focuses that the Bills will be made into laws by Congress. Of course, the President has a veto, but Congress has the final say. It also touches on taxes a bit.
4 0
3 years ago
What did the south mean by the phrase "state's rights"
Ket [755]
It meant that Northerners in free states were obligated, regardless of their feelings towards slavery, to turn escaped slaves who had made it North back over to their Southern masters.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
‘BEHAVIORIST THEORY ON LANGUAGE LEARNING AND ACQUISITION’, which one (1) of these behaviorist strategies has been proven by rese
mr_godi [17]

Answer:

The behaviorist strategies that show to be least effective in therms of supporting language learning: <u>error-correction</u>.

Explanation:

The behaviorist strategies on language learning and acquisition, involves reinforcement or reward of some kind. This theory explains learning as a process that is based on the stimulus given to the learner to achieve the goal. A person learns through practice and imitation of the given excersises.

The less effective strategie would be error and correction, because a person needs to make mistakes in order to practice and learn. By focusing on the error and the correction, this may not be the most motivatinal strategy for a student.

6 0
3 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
3 years ago
The anthropologist whose research showed that definitions of masculinity and femininity are not biological given but are learned
lapo4ka [179]

The one responsible for the change is Margaret Mead—she is known for her publications and even studies that involves with anthropology, especially in the way her research had defined masculinity and femininity which is shown in the description above. These are all cultural and not based on biological.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP FAST! :) THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME ;)
    7·2 answers
  • In his representation of Pope Leo X, Raphael did not portray him as head of state, but rather as a ____.
    6·1 answer
  • True or False?In order for the agenda-setting function hypothesis to be established as a causal relationship, a lag in public pr
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Which situation was affected depending upon whether a state was admitted as a free state or a slave state?
    7·2 answers
  • The government answers all three economic questions in a
    5·1 answer
  • Current intelligence tests compute an individual's intelligence score as ____________.
    14·1 answer
  • How are genes related to inherited traits?
    6·1 answer
  • How can we increase the HDI rank of Nepal? suggest two measures <br>​
    9·2 answers
  • Beginning in the 1800s, the British government appointed viceroys in India to
    10·2 answers
  • WHAT ARE THE RIGHTS GIVEN BY HUMAN RIGHTS?​
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!