it is unreasonable because 4.23 is bigger than 4.135! Look at the 10s place - 1 is smaller than 2, and everything afterwards is irrelevant. There could be as many zeros or any combination of numbers you want, but as long as that tens place is larger (2 vs 1), than it's not reasonable to say 4.2 is smaller!!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
please help
Well, we do not see the lines clearly (if they are dotted (inequality) or solid (inequality or equal) ), but we'll come back to this.
y<x+1 can be simplified to be y<x if we ignore the constants, so the valid part is BELOW the line, since (y<)
x-4y <=4
again, ignore the constants and simplify to
x-y<0 or
y>x so the valid part is ABOVE the line (since y>)
There are two graphs that satisfy BOTH conditions, pink (slope=1) at the bottom, and blue (slope = 1/4) on top, i.e. first and third graph.
For the absolute inequality (y<x+1), the red line must be dotted.
For the <= condition, the blue line must be solid.
As we cannot see the lines clearly, you will make the choice between the first and third graphs according to the previous paragraph.
Answer:
work is pictured and shown
Answer:
0.25 party mix.
Step-by-step explanation:
4cups=8
2=4
1=2
1/2/2=0.25
