I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
<u>The answer is "Authoritarian Government".</u>
Authoritarianism, guideline of visually impaired accommodation to authority, instead of individual opportunity of thought and activity. In government, authoritarianism indicates any political framework that amasses control in the hands of a pioneer or a little tip top that isn't naturally mindful to the body of the general population. Authoritarian leaders regularly practice control power arbitrarily and without respect to existing groups of law, and they as a rule can't be supplanted by natives picking uninhibitedly among different competitors in elections.
Answer:
1000000000 nanoseconds ( in standard form )
hope this answer helps you!
<span>A. demand
Demand is t</span><span>he general willingness of consumers to purchase a product at various prices.</span>
