Answer:
Fiona’s leader-member relations can be described as good
Explanation:
Fiedler’s contingency model states that there is no one best style of leadership.
The model argued that, a leader's effectiveness is based on the situation.
Based on this model, we know that Fiona's style of leadership is good for the union because her style was seen as fair by her employees and failure to act in the way and manner she acts would likely create despute within union members and representatives.
Answer:
On September 22, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issues a preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, which sets a date for the freedom of more than 3 million black slaves in the United States and recasts the Civil War as a fight against slavery.
Explanation:
Answer:
Babylonia fell to the Hittite king Mursili I c. 1595 BC, after which the Kassites took control and ruled for almost five centuries before being deposed by native Babylonian rulers, who continued to rule the Babylonian rump state.
Capital: Babylon; Tayma (de facto 553–543 BC)
Answer:
<u>Through trade with India and China</u>
Explanation:
After the Crusades trade links and connections between East and the West were strengthened. After the famous journey of medieval traveler Marco Polo to China Europeans became aware of the richness of that regions and the goods that could be imported.
When the famous <em>Silk road </em>was created the trade links were even more firm. This period lasted until the Ottomans conquered Byzantine Empire.
Answer:
New York Times Co. v. United States
Explanation:
This rulling by the Supreme Court happened in 1971, and it regarded the First Amendment.
It happened because New York Times leaked classified information of the report regarding the role of USA in the Indochina. The dilemma was whether can New York Times publish such classified documents, or Pentagon Papers, without risk of government punishment or censorship. They claimed that they have a constitutional right of the freedom of the press, guaranteed by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the New York Times.
