All categories

2 years ago

Assume a firm has earnings before depreciation and taxes of $620,000 and no depreciation. It is in a 40 percent tax bracket.

Business

1 answer:

kvasek [131]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

a. Its cash flow is $372,000

b. Its cash flow is $620,000.

c. The cash flow benefit the depreciation provides is $248,000

Explanation:

We have Earnings before taxes = $620,000 ( because there is no depreciation);

Tax expenses = 620,000 x 40% = $248,000;

=> Cash flow = Earnings before taxes - Tax expenses = 620,000 - 248,000 = $372,000.

We have Earnings before taxes = EBIT - Depreciation = $620,000 - $620,000 = 0;

=> Tax expenses = 0; Earning after tax = 0;

=> Cash flow = Earning after tax + depreciation = 0 + 620,000 = $620,000.

The cash flow benefit from depreciation = Depreciation expenses x tax rate = 620,000 x 40% = $248,000.

You might be interested in

Chamonix Chateau Rentals. You are planning a ski vacation to Mt. Blanc in Chamonix, France, one year from now. You are negotiati

nata0808 [166]

Answer:

The budgeted $ amount is $13,680.88

Explanation:

The purchasing power parity formula gives us an idea what an exchange spot rate would be in future period using the below formula:

Future spot rate=current spot rate*(1+US inflation)/(1+French inflation)

current spot rate=$1.3620

US inflation rate is 2.50%

French inflation is 3.50%

Future spot rate=$1.3620*(1+2.5%)/(1+3.5%)

future spot rate=$1.3488

The weekly cost of vacation would also be adjusted for inflation rate in France as follows:

Adjusted price=9800*(1+3.5%)=10143

Hence the cost of the one week rental would be 10143 multiplied by the future spot exchange rate of 1.3488 i.e $ 13,680.88 (10143*1.3488)

7 0

2 years ago

If government cuts taxes. A. after tax income should increase shifting AD to the right to a higher equilibrium level of output B

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

A. after tax income should increase shifting AD to the right to a higher equilibrium level of output

Explanation:

If the government reduces tax, the after tax income would increase and so woold demand. Thus, the aggregate demand curve would shift rightward to a higher equilibrium level of output.

If the government cuts taxes, after tax income should decrease shifting AD to the left to a lower equilibrium level of output

I hope my answer helps you

8 0

2 years ago

If people believe their rights are being violated, they have the right to a fair and impartial hearing. This reflects the basic

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

I believe its C

7 0

2 years ago

Henry Crouch's law office has traditionally ordered ink refills 55 units at a time. The firm estimates that carrying cost is 40%

defon

Answer:

Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order

Explanation:

According to the given data we have the following:

economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units

annual demand, D=235

holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4

ordering cost, S=?

In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:

EOQ=√(2×D×S)

(H)

Hence, S=(EOQ)∧2×H

2×D

S=(55)∧2×4.4

2×235

S=13,310

470

S=$28.31

Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order

4 0

3 years ago

Calculate the percentage rate management fees on the following: $575 adjusted per-unit fee, 50 total units, $600,000 annual gros

arlik [135]

Answer:

19.1% management rate.

Explanation:

Adjusted fee charge per unit = 575

Adjusted fee charge for total unit of product = 575 * 50 = $28750

Net after feel charge on goods = 600000 - 28750 = $571250

15% vacancy and loss rate = .15 * 571250 = $85687.5

Total management fee per year = $114437.5

Percentage rate management fee = (114437.5/600000) *100

= 19.1 %

8 0

3 years ago