Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the upper left graph is the correct answer
because "... or equal to" always represents a filled dot, while just "greater/less than" represents blank dot
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
rectangle has a length of
18 feet. The width is x feet
less than the length. If the
area must be less than 216
square feet, what could be
the measurement of the
width?
N + 3 simply means we are adding 3 to the number before. An example of such of a pattern would look like this:
3, 6, 9, 12
4, 7, 10, 13
5, 8, 11, 14
