The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
The answer that would make the most sense is bipolar disorder.
The correct answer is B; Fields became more productive, spurring population growth.
Further Explanation:
When the fields became more productive the farmers had more food and could make more money. This had others coming to start their own farm and grow foods. Other ways medieval towns and cities had growth was the trade fairs that would be put up. This helped the cities and towns grow larger and have more of an economy.
When the towns and cities grew, they needed merchant guilds to form and take responsibility for the improvements in the towns and cities. They also were so much trading going on that they started using the credit system instead of using cash.
Learn more about the medieval Europe at brainly.com/question/2474934
#LearnwithBrainly
The U.S Army was founded in <span>June 14, 1775, United States of America</span>
I think this would be antibiotics
