Each judgement/ statement has been paired with a descriptor:
What he did was praiseworthy because it was so selfless. [Ethical: Based on the principals of "right vs. wrong]
We should not refer to fellow humans as "homeless" if we truly consider human life as valuable in itself, since that label equates human value with the value of brick and mortar. [Aesthetic: Based on a feeling of value of art, beauty, and/or taste]
You ought to stand when the Queen enters the room. [Cultural: Based on social cultural acceptability]
You better pay your taxes if you wish to avoid jail-time. [Legal: Based in law; Not paying taxes is punishable by law]
You better pay your taxes since fair membership in communal living requires sharing in both the benefits and the burdens of that co-existence. [Ethical: Based on the principals of "right vs. wrong]
According to the protest document, the one that violates the constitutions is :
Failure to assert and support your right
According to the constitution, every citizen had the same right at the eyes of the law
hope this helps
Answer:
B. Spearman
Explanation:
Charles Spearman was a psychologist who proposed a theory of intelligence. According to him, there's a general factor (the g factor) that can be defined as the overall mental capacity of a person and that it's shown when this person performs cognitive tasks.
According to him, there are no different types of intelligence but just a general factor that determines the "intelligence" of a person and, by determining the value of this factor we could determine one person mental capacities.
Unlike the other authors given in the option, he is the <u>only one</u> who thinks there's a <u>single factor behind intelligence measures </u>(Thurstone believed there were different mental abilities, Gardner proposed the theory of multiple intelligences and Sternberg thought that there were 3 types of intelligence)
Therefore, we can conclude that Spearman would have been the most enthusiastic about the value of a single intelligence test score as an index of an individual's mental capacities.
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people
<span>it helps the players woork well with others, and have sportsmanship these are vital qualities for anyone to have</span>
