Answer:
The best answer to the question: If Erik uses the scientific method to investigate this, what type of research would he be doing, would be, observational as full participant.
Explanation:
In observational research methods, a person simply tries to answer a question, or solve an issue, by literally observing and experimenting on the field, without making changes to what is around. The question, or issue, will be resolved as the researcher observes the development of certain characteristics that would prove, or disprove, the question being researched, or solve, or not solve, the problem for which an answer is being sought. In this case, Erik wishes to see if his previous experiences dressing in business casual attire will repeat themselves when he is in college, and so, he not only wishes to test the theory that people approaches him easily if he is dressed in business casual, rather than in another attire, but he will become the test subject himself, becoming thus, a full participant. Erik will then observe the results of his experimentation, and thus come to an answer to his query.
Answer: Canada and the United States (U.S.) enjoy a unique relationship. The Canada-United States partnership is forged by shared geography, similar values, common interests, deep personal connections and powerful, multi-layered economic ties. Canada and the United States enjoy the largest trading relationship in the world. A secure and efficient flow of goods and people across the border is vital to both countries’ economic competitiveness and prosperity. When Canada and the United States work together, they enhance their security and accelerate the legitimate flow of people, goods and services. Canada and the United States remain committed to close cooperation on issues facing our two countries and to jointly address challenges around the world.
Explanation: Is this wut u were looking for?
The duty of a citizen is to participate in voting.
Answer:
there is a valid contract, but there has been no breach of that contract by the University or by Joe.
Explanation:
Joe met all the requirements the university required of course candidates that Joe would like to take. Although Joe seems to be an excellent candidate, he was not approved, while people with grades below him were proven. This sounds like an unfair case, but this was a situation where a valid contract exists, but there was no breach of that contract by the University or Joe. This is because despite Joe's selection criteria, the university stated that other criteria (chosen by the university itself) would be chosen to select candidates. Therefore it can be stated that Joe did not meet these criteria and therefore was not selected.
