Answer: because these could save you money later by lasting longer
Explanation:
When making purchases on products, it's always advisable to buy high quality products. Choosing quality over price helps in the elimination of waste, and improvement of efficienct.
As consumers, when we buy high quality products, they tend to last longer than buying products that are of low quality even though those ones may be cheaper.
Therefore, spending extra money on high-quality products can save one money later by lasting longer.
Two main assumptions of functional theory and conflict theory are Social stability, social integration and social class and gender.
<h3>What are the major assumptions of functional and conflict theories?</h3>
- Functionalism: Social stability is key to have a strong society, and adequate socialization and social integration are necessary to achieve social stability.
- Conflict theory: Society is full of pervasive inequality based on social class, gender, and other factors.
<h3>How can each theory be used to understand the North American international auto show held in Detroit each year?</h3>
The theory, functional theory for instance, can be used to understand it by knowing that Society’s social institutions perform important functions to help ensure social stability. The essence of such show is to bring about social stability
Similarly, Conflict theory can help understand that far-reaching social change is needed to reduce or eliminate social inequality and to create an egalitarian society.
Therefore, while functional theory is used to understand the show for social stability, the other theory, conflict theory, us used to bring about social equality.
learn more about social equality: brainly.com/question/24131981
#SPJ1
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
I would say A.
but C would be my second guess