1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Effectus [21]
3 years ago
11

Compare and contrast a normal fault and a reverse fault.

Geography
1 answer:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
8 0
A normal fault is when a rock at one side of the fault is pushed down relative to the other side. On the otherhand, the reverse fault is where a rock at one side of the fault is pushed up relative to the other side. 
You might be interested in
'How have human geographical patterns affected city population growth in the past?'
lukranit [14]

Answer:

more hunting, more deforstation, and collecting territory

Explanation:

hopefully I helped

7 0
3 years ago
1. Mexico is geographically located in the __________.
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

The answers are: PLATEAU REGION, MEXICO CITY, SPANISH AND INDIGENEOUS LANGUAGES, AZTEC AND 16TH, PAINTINGS.

Explanation:

1. Mexico is geographically located in the ___plateau region_______.

2. Today there are people of Mexican descent in the ___Mexico City_____.

3. The languages ​​spoken in Mexico are __spanish_______ and _____indigenous languages___.

4. The Empire AZTEC dominated Mexico from the fourteenth to the __16TH_______ centuries.

5. Frida Kahlo, the artist's wife, is known for her ____paintings______.

8 0
3 years ago
Mention the importance of education in a paragraph.​
Delvig [45]

Education is the backbone of our future as a society of growth in all things that will make life better. If we as a society don't take the education of our youth seriously, we are practically ruining our future. Education gives us knowledge of the world around us. It develops a new perspective of viewing life. Imagine a world of politics with uneducated people. Imagine a government without educated rulers... looking at history with a knowledgable perspective helps make good decisions. A wise man once said, "Those who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed to Repeat it" (George Santayana).

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
What are the four main reasons as to why, despite having an abundance of minerals and natural resources, Pakistan has been unabl
evablogger [386]

Answer:

In the Explanation

Explanation:

History of growth in Pakistan is patchy.

GDP growth rate remained near 7% during 1958–68.

Then Pakistan faced debacle of East Pakistan. It was the failure of the political system that we remained unable to resolve political differences by dialogue.

From the day one, Pakistan faced real or projected existential threat. Leaders from India like Patel prophesied that Pakistan wouldn’t withstand the looming catastrophic challenges to her economy, defence and internal linguistic & political differences.

Water from Eastern Rivers was stopped from headworks situated in India. Pakistan was put to face starvation. Pakistan lost Quaid e Azam the visionary leader and his successors were not competent enough to steer the ship.

Constitution couldn’t be framed until 1956 and basic issues of Provincial Autonomy and national language couldn’t be resolved. Pakistan had no industrial base and faced severe food shortages and essential commodities. Around eight million refugees were in camps with no assets and livelihood.

Gradually Pakistan rose from shambles. GDP growth rate remained fluctuating and especially from 1970 onward till 2020 Pakistan’s GDP growth remained much lowere than India, China, Korea, Vietnam etc and even Bangladesh.

PAKISTAN’S ECONOMIC GROWTH 1972-2010

Pakistan’s average annual real GDP Growth in the period 1972 to 2010 is about 5.2 percent by contrast the average annual real GDP growth in the period 1980 to 2008 was 9.9 percent for China and 6.4 percent for India.

Pakistan’s Real GDP Growth Rates and Net Current Account as Percentage of GDP

Democratic values couldn’t gain foot. USA always encouraged dictatorships in Pakistan whenever there was a political and strategic expediencies in the region. To use Pakistan’s strategic location to defeat Russia in Afghanistan and contain communism in Cold War era USA encouraged dictatorships in Pakistan to deal affairs with one man and make Army to Army collaboration easy and smooth.

But it is very strange to note that in the eras of three dictatorships Ayyoub 1958–59, Zia-Ul-Haq 1977–88 and Parwaiz Musharraf1999–2008 the growth rate remained around 7%. In democratic eras, it never rose above 5% rather it always remained less than 5%. Pakistan’s history is very strange and full of mysteries. It is a history of successes and failures.

We had a very strong inimical neighbour India. India always tried to put Pakistan in troubles. Instead of creating cordial relationships, India always depicted Pakistan as a rouge state forgetting that with such an inimical neighbourhood, India can’t reach the status of really welfare state. Pakistan, India and Bangladesh can do miracles. They had the potential much more than China. China was a poor country in 1947. If Pakistan couldn’t gain the full benefits of her resources, India is much behind her actual potential.

It is an era of friendships and trade. China, India, Pakistan with other South & South Eastern countries in Asia can lead the world if they stop playing in the hands of USA. If Pakistan was wrong to stand with USA, how India would be considered on the right side gain benefits for playing a subordinate role in India-Pacific Policy of USA. I have stated more than five reasons. In short:

1: We couldn’t resolve our issue of Provincial Autonomy and national language.

2: We couldn’t establish real democratic, participative and inclusive institutions

3: We couldn’t revamp our educational institutions to impart modern, scientific and innovative approach.

4: We spent much less to improve our human resource and couldn’t understand that a refined human resource earns much more than an ailing and illiterate person.

Yes, Pakistan has the potential but we are sluggish and lazy people to grab this opportunity. CPEC is a game changer. Pakistan must relocate Chinese industrial concerns at proposed eight Special Economic and Industrial Zones( SEIZs) on or near to CPEC. Pakistanis Governments failed criminally to expedite the establishment of these zones. Pakistan’s bureaucracy couldn’t resolve this complex issue. Identification of suitable industries that China will relocate, provision of requisite infrastructure and civic amenities, training of efficient man power especially youth without employment and which would require are challenges which we couldn’t resolve.

CPEC will be very useful for India as well. Pakistan provides land link to CARs& Afghanistan which are rich in energy resources India need badly. Without cheap energy resources, India can’t attain sustainable development goals.

Yes, Pakistan couldn’t rise to occasion like other similar countries. No plausible defence for it. No reason other than our laziness and sluggishness, lack of visionary leadership, perfect strategy and planning. But there is a silent resurrection. Pakistanis feel they are not where they should have been there. Destination is affront. Target is obvious. Dreams are vivid.

8 0
2 years ago
What was the Great Wagon Road?
Alla [95]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Because

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain 2 characteristics used to classify minerals.
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about Earth's poles?
    10·1 answer
  • which of the following statements best characterizes the differences between monotheism polytheism and animism
    10·2 answers
  • The Phoenician alphabet spread throughout the Mediterranean as a result of __________.
    5·1 answer
  • If it is 6 pm in Greenwich, what time will it be on 120°
    6·1 answer
  • State two effects of the rotation of the earth​
    8·2 answers
  • Why does Thandi want to hide her pregnancy from her family?​
    10·2 answers
  • Will give brainliest
    9·2 answers
  • The ______ range in size from one to 500 miles in diameter and revolve around the sun A. Moons B. Comets C. Meteors D. Satellite
    8·1 answer
  • Shape 1 and shape 2 are plotted on a coordinate plane. Which statement about the shapes is true?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!