The answer is: People surrender some of their natural rights in exchange for the common good
Both Rousseau and Locke theorized about the Social contract which is a type of agreement between the people and the legitimate powers of authority that results in the formation of a<u> state or an organized society</u>, the prime motive being the desire for protection, and in order to achieve this common good they had to be willing to forfeit some of their rights and impose the same duties on all.
The Sugar Act was created in 1764.
Both Germany and Japan rose to power between WW II and both were due to nationalism. The government structures were different though - Germany had a President while Japan had an emperor as head of state. Hilter had more power as he controlled the legislature while it was the other way round in Japan.
Japan wanted more resources as the island did not have much so they wanted to invade China. Germany suffered after WW I and wanted to push back other countries. Both used nationalism as an excuse for their aggressive actions. These are the <span>similarities and differences between the two.
</span>
