It's hard to tell where one set ends and the next starts. I think it's
A. 25, 36, 44, 51, 62, 77
B. 3, 3, 3, 7, 9, 9, 10, 14
C. 8, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21, 23, 26, 31, 39
D. 63, 65, 66, 69, 71, 78, 80, 81, 82, 82 Let's go through them.
A. 25, 36, 44, 51, 62, 77
That looks OK, standard deviation around 20, mean around 50, points with 2 standard deviations of the mean.
B. 3, 3, 3, 7, 9, 9, 10, 14
Average around 7, sigma around 4, within 2 sigma, seems ok.
C. 8, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21, 23, 26, 31, 39
Average around 20, sigma around 8, that 39 is hanging out there past two sigma. Let's reserve judgement and compare to the next one.
D. 63, 65, 66, 69, 71, 78, 80, 81, 82, 82
Average around 74, sigma 8, seems very tight.
I guess we conclude C has the outlier 39. That one doesn't seem like much of an outlier to me; I was looking for a lone point hanging out at five or six sigma.
If he plays 3 matches a week for 9 weeks, you have to multiply 3&9. 3*9=27 Daniel will have played 27 tennis matches by the end of the 9 weeks. Hope this helps:)
According to the competitive parity budgeting method, in order to attain their growth objective, they would need to have 46 percent share of the total industry marketing effort. The correct answer is B.
