Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.
Answer:
I think it's( dead body where Mike borrowed)
Explanation:
because when it says body I think of something scary going on
The first blank, the answer is congress and the second blank is the Treasury Department. In the United States, fiscal policy is coordinated by the official and authoritative branches. In the official branch, the two most powerful workplaces have a place with the president and the Treasury Department, albeit contemporary presidents regularly depend on a chamber of monetary counselors. The U.S. Congress passes laws and appropriates spending for any monetary approach measures. This includes support, pondering and endorsement from both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It is an open ended question because it cannot be answered with just a simple "yes" or "no" you actually have to include information to answer letter B
