Answer:
yes it can communicate with all interfaces on the router.
Explanation:
PC1 has the right default gateway and is using the link-local address on R1. All connected networks are on the routing table.
Netsh may be a Windows command wont to display and modify the network configuration of a currently running local or remote computer. These activities will tell you in how manny ways we can use the netsh command to configure IPv6 settings.
To use this command :
1. Open prompt .
2. Use ipconfig to display IP address information. Observe the output whether IPv6 is enabled, you ought to see one or more IPv6 addresses. A typical Windows 7 computer features a Link-local IPv6 Address, an ISATAP tunnel adapter with media disconnected, and a Teredo tunnel adapter. Link-local addresses begin with fe80::/10. ISATAP addresses are specific link-local addresses.
3. Type netsh interface ipv6 show interfaces and press Enter. note the output listing the interfaces on which IPv6 is enabled. Note that each one netsh parameters could also be abbreviated, as long because the abbreviation may be a unique parameter. netsh interface ipv6 show interfaces could also be entered as netsh ipv6 sh i.
4. Type netsh interface ipv6 show addresses Observe the results of the interface IPv6 addresses.
5. Type netsh interface ipv6 show destinationcache and press Enter. Observe the output of recent IPv6 destinations.
6. Type netsh interface ipv6 show dnsservers and press Enter. Observe the results listing IPv6 DNS server settings.
7. Type netsh interface ipv6 show neighbors and press Enter. Observe the results listing IPv6 neighbors. this is often almost like the IPv4 ARP cache.
8. Type netsh interface ipv6 show route and press Enter. Observe the results listing IPv6 route information.
something
xyjxyjmhcfgjhnmckghnm vgj,
Health care system and school system
Answer:
<u>the first friend</u>
Explanation:
It is important to <em>remember </em>that a core is the brain of the CPU (central processing unit), which means one who has a dual-core is having <em>"a dual brain" </em><em>to process information faster.</em>
Consider also, IT experts often acknowledge that in terms of speed of execution, it is proven that, "dual-core systems" are <em>faster</em> (even twice faster) than a "single-core system". The other friends were wrong because they disagreed with a widely accepted fact that dual-core is faster than single-core; and of course, <em>we know that without them being faster they can't run twice the applications and twice the data. </em>
Therefore, we can make the conclusion that the first friend's response is correct.
