Answer:
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Explanation:
Is necessary to consider different amount of suppliers and evaluate the cost. We will choose the number of suppliers which offers a lower cost.
- EMV1 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk + cost of managing supplier = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05+16000 = 9600 + 24000 + 16000 = $ 49600
- EMV2 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk of each supplier*unique event risk of each supplier + cost of managing 2 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 1200 + 16000*2 = $ 42800
- EMV3 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of managing 3 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 16000*3 = $ 57600
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The United States has six major welfare programs: TANF, Medicaid, CHIP, SNAP, EITC, Supplemental Security Income, and housing assistance.
Answer:
<u><em>The correct answer is:</em></u> clarifies (1) how the business will provide customers with value, and (2) why the business will generate revenues sufficient to cover costs and produce attractive profits.
Explanation:
The business model of a company is a tool that helps a new enterprise to enter the market seeking to understand all the variables that make up the business and that integrated will assist in providing value to customers and generating enough revenue to cover costs and produce attractive profits.
Because it is an easy tool to make, cheap and easy to implement, it is essential that each company develop its business model with a focus on creating value in order to achieve innovation and creativity for business success.
It is important for the entrepreneur to follow some steps to realize his business model, which can be constantly modified when he finds more creative strategies to generate business value. Some questions can be asked such as: What will be done, how will it be done, for whom will it be done and how much will be spent. According to all these premises, it will be possible to seek the best way to implement a business that is profitable and competitive in the market.
Firms in the oligopoly typically act more like competitors.
Explanation:
The result of a prisoner's dilemma in a duopoly is often that even though firm A and B could make the highest combined profits by cooperating, in producing lower level of output and act like a monopolist. The two firms end with an increasing output and earn only $400 in each profits.
Since the number of sellers in an oligopoly grows larger, the market looks like a competitive market. There are more chances to get incentive or cheat if the person or firm cooperated.
The prisoner's dilemma is a game that tells why cooperation is difficult to maintain for oligopolists. in this game the strategy of each actor is to defect.
Complete question:
Consider the game of chicken. Two players drive their cars down the center of the road directly at each other. Each player chooses SWERVE or STAY. Staying wins you the admiration of your peers (a big payoff) only if the other player swerves. Swerving loses face if the other player stays. However, clearly, the worst output is for both players to stay! Specifically, consider the following payouts. Player two Stay swervePlayer one stay -6 -6 2 -2 swerve -2 2 1 1
a) Does either player have a dominant strategy?
b) Suppose that Player B has adopted the strategy of Staying 1/5 of the time and swerving 4/5 of the time. Show that Player A is indifferent between swerving
and staying.
c) If both player A and Player B use this probability mix, what is the chance that they crash?
Explanation:
a. There is no dominant strategy for either player. Suppose two players agree to live. Then the best answer for the player is to swerve(-6 versus -2). Yet if the player turns two, the player will remain one (2 vs 1).
b. Player B must be shown to be indifferent among swerving and staying if it implements a policy (stay= 1⁄4, swerving= 5/4).
When we quantify a predicted award on the stay / swerving of Player A, we get
E(stay)= (1/5)(-6)+ (4/5)(2)= 2/5 E(swerve)= (1/5)(-2)
c. They both remain 1/5 of the time. The risk of a crash (rest, stay) is therefore (1/5)(1/5)= 1/25= 4%
