Answer:
The framers off thee Constitution establisheed the broad structure of government but also left the system flexible enough to adapt to changing condiitions. A document of less than 6,000 words, the Constitution is not overly detaled
Loss of follow-up is a problem in most cohort studies and often introduces bias. It is a situation in which a researcher loses contact with a subject, resulting in missing data. Too many subjects failing follow-up diminish the internal validity of the study.
<h3>What is follow-up loss in cohort studies? </h3>
- Follow-up loss introduces bias (observed deviation of relevant measures from what would have been observed without bias) if there is a difference in the likelihood of loss due to follow-up related to exposure status and outcome.
- In the clinical research trials industry, loss due to follow-up is defined as patients who were actively participating in a clinical research trial at some point but who lost themselves (due to errors in the computer tracking system or due to unavailability).
- In cohort studies: 1) Imaging outcome, is loss of follow-up. 2) These are essentially prospective studies, so confounding factors are not an issue. 3) These studies help examine multiple outcomes from a single, infrequent exposure. 4) These are usually faster and cheaper than case-control studies.
<h3>What are advantage and disadvantages of cohort studies?</h3>
- In general, the main advantage of cohort studies is the ability to study multiple exposures and multiple endpoints in a single cohort. This recording allows you to select index groups, so you can explore rare recordings.
- A major weakness of cohort studies is that this type of study design can be time consuming and expensive for results that are rare or evolve over long periods of time. It's a question of research.
To learn more about cohort study visit:
brainly.com/question/4562396
#SPJ4
Answer:
I think the answer is letter
Answer:
b) focusing on quantity over quality
Explanation:
Participation has to do with including other people in a task to achieve a common goal.
Being a team player is an effective participation strategy because it means you include other people by asking for their views, input, ideas, and effort.
Engaging in meaningful conversations is another effective participation strategy because one is sharing ideas and rubbing minds with others in order to get a job done.
The option that is NOT an effective participation strategy is choosing quantity over quality because this shows that one does not value quality but instead chooses to do more, even if they are of lesser quality and this suggest that a team involvement is not really valued.
Answer:B-To increase demand for domestic goods
Explanation:
