Answer:
cohesion
Explanation:
the action or fact of forming a united whole.
Purchasing power parity (ppp) is considered an objective measurement poverty levels.
Purchasing power parity:
- By removing the variations in price levels between nations, purchasing power parities (PPPs) are rates of currency translation that aim to equalize the purchasing power of various currencies.
- monetary and developmental. Timothy Callen the rate at which the equivalent amount of goods and services might be purchased in one country using the currency of the other at a certain exchange rate.
- By taking the geometric mean of the pricing relationships between each pair of economies for the two varieties of rice, the basic-heading PPP for each pair of economies may be calculated directly. This comparison is bilateral.
- China, despite still being a developing country, is thought to have the greatest PPP in the entire world. This is due to the country's economy being the largest in the world, despite the fact that the bulk of its population earn extremely low wages.
Learn more about Purchasing power parity here
brainly.com/question/14635386
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em><u>It would generate a financial disadvantage for 62,800</u></em>
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-&continued&discontinued&differential\\Sales&351,900&0&-351,900\\Variable&-260,100&0&260,100\\Contribution&91,800&0&-91,800\\Fixed&-103,000&-74,000&29,000\\total&-11,200&-74,000&-62,800\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D-%26continued%26discontinued%26differential%5C%5CSales%26351%2C900%260%26-351%2C900%5C%5CVariable%26-260%2C100%260%26260%2C100%5C%5CContribution%2691%2C800%260%26-91%2C800%5C%5CFixed%26-103%2C000%26-74%2C000%2629%2C000%5C%5Ctotal%26-11%2C200%26-74%2C000%26-62%2C800%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
It would generate a financial disadvantage for 62,800
Because the product, while is having a loss, their contribution cover is enought to cover at least the avoidable fixed cost.
He should look in a phone book of the news paper. These two options would be the most reliable.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The percentage of loss covered is
= Bought price of insurance policy ÷ purchase price × 100
= $160,000 ÷ $178,000 × 100
= 89.89%
b. The dollar amount of loss covered is
= Percentage of loss covered × suffered amount
= 89.89% × $23,000
= $20,674.70
c. For reimbursement of the fire loss the amount should be equal to the replacement cost of the home i.e $300,000. It is fully reimbursed
We simply applied the above formula
