<span>I contributed to the total supply of money in the economy because my demand for good and services were paid for using money and it made the supplier to have more resources with which he can manufacture or purchase more product so that consumers can purchase. In this my economic decision was using the money which I could have used for other purposes for the purchase of goods and services as I had to forgo something and also my account balance became reduced as a result of the decision i made</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
Answer:
Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Stephen can move 70 boxes or bake 28 cookies:
Opportunity cost of moving a box = (28 ÷ 70)
= 0.4 cookies
Opportunity cost of baking a cookie = (70 ÷ 28)
= 2.5 boxes
LeBron could move 24 boxes or bake 6 cookies:
Opportunity cost of moving a box = (6 ÷ 24)
= 0.25 cookies
Opportunity cost of baking a cookie = (24 ÷ 6)
= 4 boxes
Yes, trade is possible.
Stephen has a comparative advantage in baking cookies because of the lower opportunity cost than LeBron, so he is specialized in baking cookies.
On the other hand, LeBron has a comparative advantage in moving boxes because of the lower opportunity cost than Stephen, so he is specialized in moving boxes.
