Answer:
B) Robert E. Lee
Explanation:
His plan to arm slaves with the weapons he and his men seized from the arsenal was thwarted, however, by local farmers, militiamen, and Marines led by Robert E. Lee. Within 36 hours of the attack, most of Brown's men had been killed or captured.
West of the Mississippi River.
The Cherokee traveled by foot or by canoe.
not sure if this is 100% correct
Answer:
Authoritarian rule can be or cannot be legitimate because existence of pure legitimacy is not possible
Explanation:
The legitimacy represents outspoken public loyalty and conformist mentality of a individual /group/organization which shapes the repressive administrative machinery to be of a high developed nature. This is not possible in authoritarian regimes which leverage to facilitate certain sects of the society like elite group.
However, in current time pure legitimacy is also not possible hence the concept of authoritative legitimacy is arising.
1. The cold war.
c.
the state of tension and hostility between the United States and the Soviet Union from 1946 to 1990
2. Truman Doctrine
b.
policy meant that the United States would resist the spread of communism throughout the world
3. Marshall Plan
e. alliance between U.S. and Western European Countries
4. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
the United States offered a massive aid package to Europe to strengthen democracies and stop the spread of communism
5. Warsaw Pact
alliance between Soviet Union and Eastern European Countries
"A government operates with the goal of promoting human rights" is based on John Locke's definition of the social contract.
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The concept of social contracts states "that people work together in society according to an arrangement that determines moral and political rules of behaviour". Number of individuals seem to have faith that if we expend a life by a social agreement, we should live by our own choices but morally rather than just because it is predicted of a divine being.
John Locke's interpretation of the theory of social contracts hits in suggesting that the only right individual to give up in order to join civil society and its rewards is the right to punish others for violating their rights.
