1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
5

select the clause from the drop down menu to correctly complete the sentence. George washington could have become king of Americ

a​

English
2 answers:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

2- When the Revolutionary War ended,

Explanation:

The correct sentence should read as follows: When the Revolutionary War ended, George washington could have become king of America​.

As the adverbial of time is in initial position (which is a marked or non-typical position), you must place a comma after it. The normal word order of a sentence should be:

George washington could have become king of America​ when the Revolutionary War ended.

(Subject + Verb + Complement)

However, for some reason (which could be for the sake of emphasis), the adverbial of time or Complement "when the Revolutionary War ended" has been moved to initial position, and this movement must be singaled with a comma.

To sum up, you always use a comma after an adverbial which is in initial position.

As to the other options, they all must be discarded because the punctuation is not appropriate:

1- <em>When the Revolutionary War ended</em>: there is no punctuation, as the comma after this clause is missing.

3- <em>When the Revolutionary War, ended</em>: you cannot separate a subject and a verb with a comma. It is not grammatically correct.

4- <em>When the Revolutionary War, ended,</em>: Same case as 3, although the comma after "ended" is correct, the one before "ended" is not. You cannot separate a subject and a verb with a comma.

Ket [755]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The asnwer would be B or the second one :3

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Paragraph Four
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

He thinks it is important to help others

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"She picked purple peppers" and "I
Karolina [17]

The sentence: "She picked purple peppers" and "I saw five fish fly past," are examples of:

  • Alliteration
<h3 /><h3>What is alliteration?</h3>

Alliteration refers to a style of speech where the initial letter that sounds and appears the same way is repeated in a particular order. The words often stick together as can be seen in the sentence above. A close look at the sentence shows that the initial letter p of three words appears closely and repetitively.

Also, the initial four 'f' letters appear in a particular order and closely too. So, when the letters have the same sounds and follow each other in a close manner, we can immediately identify the author's use of alliteration.

Alliteration is one of many other literary techniques that are used to ascertain certain moods or goals. These also sound alike, therefore, we can refer to the sentence form used here as alliteration because the letters 'f' and 'p' are repeated.

Learn more about Alliteration here:

brainly.com/question/536028

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
What is the overall tone of caius julius caesar, first roman that came into britain
yarga [219]

The overall tone was formal.

6 0
3 years ago
What is rhetoric?
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
Rhetoric the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.
So it would be A
6 0
3 years ago
Write an 150 word essay on the topic of immigration. Your essay will use research to describe the changes and challenges that to
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The debates over immigration and immigration policy did not develop in recent memory. In fact, one could argue that the debates over this issue date back to antiquity. During Biblical times people did not agree with each other regarding immigration. Even the authors of the Scriptures had different opinions about immigration. Matthew and Paul are two New Testament authors who each discuss the topic of immigration in their writings. Matthew did so in the second chapter of his Gospel, and Paul, in the thirteenth chapter of his letter to the Romans.

In the Gospel of Matthew, the author discusses the story of the birth of Jesus Christ. Some people could argue that this story is an argument in favor of lenient immigration policies and international laws, especially those regarding refugees and asylum. Matthew mentions the dream that Joseph had about “an angel of the Lord” (Matthew 2:13) telling him to flee to Egypt with his wife and their new baby because King Herod was searching for baby Jesus in order to kill him since Herod did not want to believe that Jesus was the Messiah. This dream conversation is important because part of the context of Matthew is trying to convince people that Jesus is the Messiah.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Want to hear a song?
    15·2 answers
  • How much physical activity should an adult have each week?
    12·2 answers
  • Who was Bob ewell yelling at
    9·1 answer
  • What comprises a list of main points and sub-points of a topic to include in a presentation?
    8·1 answer
  • I need help on writing a letter to a friend who did a good deed for me​
    14·1 answer
  • What is the conflict between the greasers and the socs in the outsiders
    9·1 answer
  • The Internet is written in a "language" called _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Which two events cause Jack to change over the course of the story?
    6·1 answer
  • Girls answer this: how can i be a gentleman? :(
    14·1 answer
  • What is the American Dream? Has it changed from the 1920's to present day? If so how? Explain in detail
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!