I believe the best answer for this would be D
Explanation: The Mandate of Heaven did not require a ruler to be of noble birth, and had no time limitations. Instead, rulers were expected to be good and just in order to keep the Mandate. The Zhou claimed that their rule was justified by the Mandate of Heaven. In other words, the Zhou believed that the Shang kings had become immoral with their excessive drinking, luxuriant living, and cruelty, and so had lost their mandate.
I believe it's "Some schools have sought to have the Supreme Court reverse its ruling in a related case with First Amendment implications, Tinker v. Des Moines."
Explanation:
The landmark January 1988 decision in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier was a giant step back for student press and speech rights. Unlike an earlier Supreme Court ruling that established the so-called Tinker Standard, the Hazelwood decision declared students do shed some of their Constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate
The kings of Portugal<span>, </span>France<span>, and </span><span>England.</span>
B. If you're referring to the Abrahamic Covenant (circumcise your kids because all Jews are Abram's grandkids) then yes. Christians don't acknowledge this, and anyone can enter Christianity through the sacraments.
